NonpartisanIndependent, data-first coverage of US elections — polls, forecasts, and prediction markets, refreshed daily.Updated daily.What's new·Methodology·Send feedback
Races · house · 2026 · New Mexico
</> Embed
house · open seat

Gabe Vasquez vs Greg Cunningham

Lean DD +4.5 forecast · 3 months 27 days to election· 1 polls · 4 marketsLast poll 70d agoMarkets 11h agoRating today
Live model · win probabilityupdated 11h ago · poliagg-v34
64% Vasquez (D)
36% Cunningham (R)
R+15R+5TIEDD+5D+15
Predicted final margin D +4.5 · 80% CI R+11.6 → D+20.6 · 3 months 27 days to election
Momentum
insufficient data
Tipping-point P
3.7%
Decisive for chamber control
Market · D-side
D 86¢
Cross-platform consensus
News articles · 30d
5
articles · new
Caution · early warning
Editorial raters moved while polling has gone quiet

The last rating change here was 22d ago, but only 0 polls have landed in the last 60 days. When raters move and pollsters don't, the rating shift may be running ahead of the data. Watch for a late-cycle correction in either direction.

Where this race stands
Verified

Lean D · model 64% D · market gap 26pp

Polling average rates this race Lean D (D+2.0, sourced from polls).

The poliagg-v34 ensemble forecasts D+4.5 with an 80% CI ranging from R+11.6 (10th pctile) to D+20.6 (90th pctile), giving D a 64% chance of winning.

Tipping-point probability: 3.7% of simulations see this race as decisive for chamber control.

Uncertainty score: 85/100 (high). Key drivers: only 0-1 recent polls; wide forecast CI (32.2pp). Treat any single point estimate with extra caution.

Model and market disagree sharply. Model says D wins at 64%, market says 90% — 26pp gap. Either side could be wrong — worth a closer look.

CITATIONS · lean-d · low-tipping · uncertainty-high · market-disagreement-large
How confident are we?0 = certain · 100 = max uncertain
Combined
85
High uncertainty
Main driver: only 0-1 recent polls.
Forecast CI width100
32.2pp 80% interval
Inter-model disagreement25
5.0pp across models
Polling sparsity100
0 polls in 60d · target ≥ 8
Forecast · poliagg-v34
Predicted final margin
D +4.5
80% CI: R +11.6D +20.6 · win prob 64%
R+30R+15TIEDD+15D+30
Quality · inputs
Data quality · medium
Polls used1
Days to election118
Residual σ12.56pt
Generated7/7/2026
Compare with other models3 models
qgbt-v1GBT (qgbt)
D +2.4
80% CI R +0.3 → D +8.7
CV MAE 8.51
bayes-v1Bayes / Kalman
D +7.4
80% CI D +3.5 → D +11.3
CV MAE 3.06
consensusMarket-implied
D +10.0
no interval
market-implied

Polling average

36404448VASQUEZ 45.7CUNNINGHAM 38.3APR '26APR '26APR '26
Weighted, plus each pollster's measured bias subtracted before averaging.

Prediction markets

Consensus · D 86¢2 platformsupdated 11h ago
DisagreementMarkets are 40 points more bullish on D than polling. Markets 86% · polls 46%.
Cross-platform price · history
40¢50¢60¢70¢80¢90¢370 DAYS · D YES PRICENOWJul 2Jul 7
Per-platform · current
PlatformD YESR YES7d ΔVolvs cons
Polymarket
Will the Republican Party win the NM-02 House seat?
82¢17¢+0¢-4
Kalshi
NM-02 House winner?
90¢18¢+8¢$0K+4
Polymarket sits 4¢ below consensus.

All polls · 1 results

strongpositiveinfocautionflag
DatePollster · trust signalsn · popLeanBias · trackvs ratersD · R
Apr 27co/efficient+1For · efficient (R)879 · LVR-LEANR +5.413 tracked-3.4r lean43 · 41

Endorsements · 22 total

Source · Wikipedia · 0 candidates with no endorsements yet
14Vasquez · 64%
Cunningham · 36%8
DGabe Vasquez14 endorsers
Most notable · Donald Trump · president of the United States (2017–2021, 2025–present)
Organizations6
Other5
Elected officials3
Federal 3State 0Local 0
RGreg Cunningham8 endorsers
Most notable · Donald Trump · president of the United States (2017–2021, 2025–present)
Elected officials7
Federal 7State 0Local 0
Organizations1

Money raised · own committees

FEC Schedule E (independent expenditures) + candidate-committee totals · last filing 2026-01-01
Gabe VasquezH2NM02191 ↗
Receipts
$3.2M
Disburse
$1.2M
Cash on hand
$2.0M
Debts
$0
No industry data.
No contributor data.
Greg CunninghamOWN COMMITTEE
Receipts
$678.5K
Disburse
$329.3K
Cash on hand
$349.2K
Debts
$0
No industry data.
No contributor data.

Outside spending · independent expenditures

FEC Schedule E (independent expenditures) + candidate-committee totals · 24/48-hr IE reports
IE total
$123.33
D side
$123.33 · 100%
R side
$0 · 0%
Top spender
GIVEGREEN UNITED AC…
For / against split
For Vasquez $123.33
SpenderSideAmountShareTarget
GIVEGREEN UNITED ACTIOND$123.33100%for Gabe Vasquez

Editorial ratings · 4 raters

Cook · Sabato · Inside Elections · 538 · DDHQ et al.
Safe D1
Lean D2
Tilt D1
Cook Political Report
Lean D
Jun 17
Inside Elections
Tilt D
Jun 24
Sabato's Crystal Ball
Lean D
Jun 8
Split Ticket
Safe D
Jun 24

Demographic crosstabs

age · education · race · gender
No demographic crosstabs published for this race yet. Most pollsters release only topline numbers; subgroup breakdowns (age, education, race, gender) appear here when a pollster publishes them.

In the news

5 shown · last 30d · Google News
News volume · 30d
5 articles · building history
Net favorability
+0.60
Coverage lean (D−R) · first week of data
Coverage tilt
D 60%
Neutral 40%
60% of outlets rated · by editorial lean
Rating timeline
Jun 14, 2026Lean Dmodel
Jun 4, 2026Tossupmodel
May 11, 2026Lean Dmodel
May 5, 2026Tilt Dmodel
May 3, 2026Lean Dmodel
Verification trail
Polls verified1 / 1deterministic
Polls flaggednone
Markets ingested2 platformsupdated 11h ago
FEC filingssyncedcommittee + IE · 2026-01-01
Endorsements22 totalWikipedia scrape
News coverage5 / 30dGoogle News
Method · bounds + percentage totals + date-order checks