Races · house · 2026 · IA
house · open seat

Lindsay James vs Zach Nunn

Tilt R R +1.5 · 176 days to election · 4 polls · 0 markets Last poll 26d ago Rating 1d ago
Where this race stands
Verified

Tilt R · model 99% R

tilt-r · uncertainty-high
Forecast · poliagg-v8
Predicted final margin
R +33.5
80% CI: R +51.0R +15.9 · win prob 1%
R+30R+15TIEDD+15D+30
Quality · inputs
Data quality · medium
Polls used4
Days to election181
Residual σ13.66pt
Generated5/6/2026
Compare with other models1 models
poliagg-v8Ensemble (production)
R +33.5
80% CI R +51.0R +15.9
CV MAE 13.66

Polling average

Simple Weighted House-corrected Trimmed LOESS Kalman
Method:Weighted, plus each pollster's measured bias subtracted before averaging.
|Toggle:

All polls · 4 results

4 of 4 polls
EndPollsterWeightLeanSampleMoEPopTrust signalsResultsSource
4/14/2026Public Policy Polling1.00(D+1.1)675±3.2RV
commissioned by D-aligned: Internal D-aligneduncorrelated with editorial consensus+2
  • commissioned by D-aligned: Internal D-aligned
    This poll was commissioned by a Democratic-aligned committee, party, or PAC (Internal D-aligned). Such polls historically lean toward their sponsor.
  • uncorrelated with editorial consensus
    Across 368 historical paired polls, this pollster's margins don't track the editorial consensus (Pearson r < 0.5). Independence from consensus is informational — could indicate genuine methodological independence or noisy results.
  • registered voters
    Registered-voter sample — broader than likely-voter screens; typical for early-cycle polling before turnout signals stabilize.
  • bias D+1.1pt
    Across 72 historical scored polls the average error vs. actual margin is D+1.1pt.
Joe Mitchell 33.0 · Lindsay James 36.0pollarch
3/14/2026Ragnar Research Partners1.00R400±5.0LV
commissioned by R-aligned: Internal R-alignedno scored polls+2
  • commissioned by R-aligned: Internal R-aligned
    This poll was commissioned by a Republican-aligned committee, party, or PAC (Internal R-aligned). Such polls historically lean toward their sponsor.
  • no scored polls
    Pollster has no historical polls with a known outcome in our database, so accuracy and bias cannot be measured.
  • uncorrelated with editorial consensus
    Across 80 historical paired polls, this pollster's margins don't track the editorial consensus (Pearson r < 0.5). Independence from consensus is informational — could indicate genuine methodological independence or noisy results.
  • likely-voter screen
    Likely-voter screen — pollster filters respondents by reported turnout intent. Generally tighter for predicting elections than registered- or adult-population polls.
Zach Nunn 48.0 · Sarah Trone Garriott 42.0pollarch
9/18/2025Public Policy Polling1.00(D+1.1)717RV
commissioned by D-aligned: Internal D-aligned234d old+3
  • commissioned by D-aligned: Internal D-aligned
    This poll was commissioned by a Democratic-aligned committee, party, or PAC (Internal D-aligned). Such polls historically lean toward their sponsor.
  • 234d old
    Poll was fielded 234 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • uncorrelated with editorial consensus
    Across 368 historical paired polls, this pollster's margins don't track the editorial consensus (Pearson r < 0.5). Independence from consensus is informational — could indicate genuine methodological independence or noisy results.
  • registered voters
    Registered-voter sample — broader than likely-voter screens; typical for early-cycle polling before turnout signals stabilize.
  • bias D+1.1pt
    Across 72 historical scored polls the average error vs. actual margin is D+1.1pt.
Zach Nunn 44.0 · Jennifer Konfrst 44.0pollarch
6/19/2025Public Policy Polling1.00(D+1.1)555unknown
commissioned by D-aligned: Internal D-aligned325d old+2
  • commissioned by D-aligned: Internal D-aligned
    This poll was commissioned by a Democratic-aligned committee, party, or PAC (Internal D-aligned). Such polls historically lean toward their sponsor.
  • 325d old
    Poll was fielded 325 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • uncorrelated with editorial consensus
    Across 368 historical paired polls, this pollster's margins don't track the editorial consensus (Pearson r < 0.5). Independence from consensus is informational — could indicate genuine methodological independence or noisy results.
  • bias D+1.1pt
    Across 72 historical scored polls the average error vs. actual margin is D+1.1pt.
Mariannette Miller-Meeks 39.0 · Christina Bohannan 43.0pollarch

Trust signals are deterministic flags computed from the pollster scorecard (track-record size, historical bias, aggregation weight) and the poll itself (sample size, population, age, citation availability). No interpretation; click any row to see the cited numbers behind each flag.

Editorial ratings · poll-vs-rater

3 raters
Rater Rating Updated Poll D-marg. Rater marg. Δ poll−rater
The Cook Political Report Safe R Feb 6 -1.5 -18.0 +16.5
Inside Elections Safe R Mar 7 -1.5 -18.0 +16.5
Sabato's Crystal Ball Safe R Apr 10 -1.5 -18.0 +16.5

Δ POLL−RATER = polling-consensus margin minus the rater's implied bucket midpoint. Positive = polls more D than rater; negative = rater more D than polls. |Δ| < 0.6 well-aligned · 0.6–1.5 mild divergence · ≥1.5 contested call.

last poll 4 weeks ago (4/14/2026) last market quote rating computed 1 day ago
Rating history (2 changes)
  • 5/6/2026 Tilt R R+1.5 via polls held 2d
  • 5/4/2026 Safe R via pvi