NonpartisanIndependent, data-first coverage of US elections — polls, forecasts, and prediction markets, refreshed daily.Updated daily.What's new·Methodology·Send feedback
Races · house · 2026 · Wisconsin
</> Embed
PrimariesThis seat also has primary-season views:Republican primary
house · open seat

Wisconsin house

Safe RR +23.2 forecast · 3 months 27 days to election· 0 polls · 2 marketsLast poll 67d agoMarkets 11h agoRating today
Live model · win probabilityupdated 11h ago · poliagg-v34
3% (D)
97% Alfonso (R)
R+15R+5TIEDD+5D+15
Predicted final margin R +23.2 · 80% CI R+39.3 → R+7.1 · 3 months 27 days to election
Momentum
insufficient data
Tipping-point P
3.6%
Decisive for chamber control
Market · D-side
D 11¢
Cross-platform consensus
News articles · 30d
no recent coverage
Where this race stands
Verified

Likely R · model 97% R

No recent polls or markets for this race. PVI baseline (R+11) suggests Likely R.

The poliagg-v34 ensemble forecasts R+23.2 with an 80% CI ranging from R+39.3 (10th pctile) to R+7.1 (90th pctile), giving R a 97% chance of winning.

Tipping-point probability: 3.6% of simulations see this race as decisive for chamber control.

Uncertainty score: 100/100 (high). Key drivers: only 0-1 recent polls; wide forecast CI (32.2pp). Treat any single point estimate with extra caution.

CITATIONS · likely-r · low-tipping · uncertainty-high
How confident are we?0 = certain · 100 = max uncertain
Combined
100
High uncertainty
Main driver: only 0-1 recent polls.
Forecast CI width100
32.2pp 80% interval
Inter-model disagreement100
24.7pp across models
Polling sparsity100
0 polls in 60d · target ≥ 8
Forecast · poliagg-v34
Predicted final margin
R +23.2
80% CI: R +39.3R +7.1 · win prob 3%
R+45R+23TIEDD+23D+45
Quality · inputs
Data quality · medium
Polls used0
Days to election118
Residual σ12.56pt
Generated7/7/2026
Compare with other models3 models
qgbt-v1GBT (qgbt)
R +26.7
80% CI R +32.5 → R +19.3
CV MAE 8.51
bayes-v1Bayes / Kalman
R +2.0
80% CI R +4.8 → D +0.9
CV MAE 2.23
consensusMarket-implied
R +11.6
no interval
market-implied

Prediction markets

Consensus · D 11¢1 platformupdated 11h ago
Cross-platform price · history
5¢10¢15¢20¢25¢54 DAYS · D YES PRICENOWMay 14Jul 7
Per-platform · current
PlatformD YESR YES7d ΔVolvs cons
Polymarket
Will the Democratic Party win the WI-07 House seat?
11¢87¢+0¢+0

Endorsements · 11 total

Source · Wikipedia · 0 candidates with no endorsements yet
Alfonso · 100%11
RMichael Alfonso11 endorsers
Most notable · Donald Trump · 45th and 47th president of the United States (2017–2021, 2025–present)
Elected officials10
Federal 10State 0Local 0
Organizations1

Money raised · own committees

FEC Schedule E (independent expenditures) + candidate-committee totals · last filing 2026-05-29
Michael AlfonsoH6WI07223 ↗
Receipts
$914.4K
Disburse
$182.5K
Cash on hand
$731.8K
Debts
$0
No industry data.
No contributor data.

Outside spending · independent expenditures

FEC Schedule E (independent expenditures) + candidate-committee totals · 24/48-hr IE reports
IE total
$2.0M
D side
$0 · 0%
R side
$2.0M · 100%
Top spender
NORTHWOODS FUTURE PAC
For / against split
For Alfonso $2.0M
SpenderSideAmountShareTarget
NORTHWOODS FUTURE PACR$2.0M100%for Michael Alfonso
Turning Point PACR$8.8K0%for Michael Alfonso

Editorial ratings · 4 raters

Cook · Sabato · Inside Elections · 538 · DDHQ et al.
Safe R4
Cook Political Report
Safe R
Jun 17
Inside Elections
Safe R
Jun 24
Sabato's Crystal Ball
Safe R
Jun 8
Split Ticket
Safe R
Jun 24

Demographic crosstabs

age · education · race · gender
No demographic crosstabs published for this race yet. Most pollsters release only topline numbers; subgroup breakdowns (age, education, race, gender) appear here when a pollster publishes them.
Rating timeline
May 5, 2026Safe Rmodel
May 3, 2026Tossupmodel
Verification trail
Polls verified0 / 0deterministic
Polls flaggednone
Markets ingested1 platformupdated 11h ago
FEC filingssyncedcommittee + IE · 2026-05-29
Endorsements17 totalWikipedia scrape
News coverage< 5 articlesGoogle News
Method · bounds + percentage totals + date-order checks