Races · Senate · 2018 · MI
Senate · class II · open seat

Debbie Stabenow vs John James

Tossup · 39 polls · 0 markets Last poll 2743d ago Rating 1d ago
Caution · early warning
Editorial raters moved while polling has gone quiet

The last rating change here was 1d ago, but only 39 polls have landed in the last 60 days. When raters move and pollsters don't, the rating shift may be running ahead of the data. Watch for a late-cycle correction in either direction.

Where this race stands
Verified

Tossup

tossup

Polling average

Simple Weighted House-corrected Trimmed LOESS Kalman
Method:Weighted, plus each pollster's measured bias subtracted before averaging.
|Toggle:

All polls · 39 results

39 of 39 polls
EndPollsterWeightLeanSampleMoEPopTrust signalsResultsSource
11/5/2018Mitchell Research1.09neutral(R+0.0)827±3.4unknown
2743d oldbias R+0.0pt
  • 2743d old
    Poll was fielded 2743 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • bias R+0.0pt
    Across 17 historical scored polls the average error vs. actual margin is R+0.0pt.
Debbie Stabenow 49.0 · John James 46.0pollarch
11/5/2018The Trafalgar Group0.89R(R+3.4)1817±2.3unknown
commissioned by R-aligned: Internal R-alignedhistorical bias R+3.4pt+2
  • commissioned by R-aligned: Internal R-aligned
    This poll was commissioned by a Republican-aligned committee, party, or PAC (Internal R-aligned). Such polls historically lean toward their sponsor.
  • historical bias R+3.4pt
    Across 52 historical scored polls the average error vs. actual margin is R+3.4pt — a measurable house effect.
  • 2743d old
    Poll was fielded 2743 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • n=1,817
    Sample size of 1,817 respondents implies a margin of error around ±2.3pt — tighter than the ~600-respondent typical.
Debbie Stabenow 53.0 · John James 44.0pollarch
11/4/2018Mitchell Research1.09neutral(R+0.0)701±3.7unknown
2744d oldbias R+0.0pt
  • 2744d old
    Poll was fielded 2744 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • bias R+0.0pt
    Across 17 historical scored polls the average error vs. actual margin is R+0.0pt.
Debbie Stabenow 53.0 · John James 46.0pollarch
11/4/2018Change Research0.61L(D+3.7)880unknown
historical bias D+3.7pt2744d old+1
  • historical bias D+3.7pt
    Across 18 historical scored polls the average error vs. actual margin is D+3.7pt — a measurable house effect.
  • 2744d old
    Poll was fielded 2744 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • high variance vs editorial consensus
    Stdev of (poll − rater consensus) across 30 historical paired polls exceeds 8pt — this pollster's results swing widely relative to where the editors place the same races.
Debbie Stabenow 49.0 · John James 47.0pollarch
11/3/2018Research Co.1.01(D+1.5)450±4.6unknown
2745d oldbias D+1.5pt+1
  • 2745d old
    Poll was fielded 2745 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • bias D+1.5pt
    Across 49 historical scored polls the average error vs. actual margin is D+1.5pt.
  • tracks editorial consensus
    Across 53 historical paired polls, this pollster's D-margins track the rater consensus (Cook / Sabato / IE / 538 / DDHQ etc.) with high correlation (r ≥ 0.85) and small mean delta (|Δ| ≤ 2pt). Their results align with conventional wisdom.
Debbie Stabenow 52.0 · John James 36.0pollarch
10/30/2018Gravis Marketing0.72L(D+2.9)764±3.6unknown
bias D+2.9pt2749d old+1
  • bias D+2.9pt
    Across 33 historical scored polls the average error vs. actual margin is D+2.9pt.
  • 2749d old
    Poll was fielded 2749 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • uncorrelated with editorial consensus
    Across 49 historical paired polls, this pollster's margins don't track the editorial consensus (Pearson r < 0.5). Independence from consensus is informational — could indicate genuine methodological independence or noisy results.
Debbie Stabenow 54.0 · John James 41.0pollarch
10/27/2018Glengariff Group0.81L(D+4.6)600±4.0unknown
2752d oldtracks editorial consensus
  • 2752d old
    Poll was fielded 2752 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • tracks editorial consensus
    Across 15 historical paired polls, this pollster's D-margins track the rater consensus (Cook / Sabato / IE / 538 / DDHQ etc.) with high correlation (r ≥ 0.85) and small mean delta (|Δ| ≤ 2pt). Their results align with conventional wisdom.
Debbie Stabenow 53.0 · John James 36.0pollarch
10/26/2018Emerson College1.00(D+0.7)822±3.6unknown
2753d oldtracks editorial consensus+1
  • 2753d old
    Poll was fielded 2753 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • tracks editorial consensus
    Across 234 historical paired polls, this pollster's D-margins track the rater consensus (Cook / Sabato / IE / 538 / DDHQ etc.) with high correlation (r ≥ 0.85) and small mean delta (|Δ| ≤ 2pt). Their results align with conventional wisdom.
  • accurate · bias D+0.7pt
    Across 117 historical scored polls this pollster's average error vs. actual margin is D+0.7pt — within ±1pt.
Debbie Stabenow 52.0 · John James 43.0pollarch
10/25/2018Mitchell Research1.09neutral(R+0.0)400±5.0unknown
2754d oldbias R+0.0pt
  • 2754d old
    Poll was fielded 2754 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • bias R+0.0pt
    Across 17 historical scored polls the average error vs. actual margin is R+0.0pt.
Debbie Stabenow 52.0 · John James 46.0pollarch
10/24/2018Target Insyght1.00800±3.0unknown
no scored polls2755d old
  • no scored polls
    Pollster has no historical polls with a known outcome in our database, so accuracy and bias cannot be measured.
  • 2755d old
    Poll was fielded 2755 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
Debbie Stabenow 53.0 · John James 43.0pollarch
10/23/2018EPIC MRA1.00(D+0.8)600±4.0unknown
2756d oldtracks editorial consensus
  • 2756d old
    Poll was fielded 2756 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • tracks editorial consensus
    Across 13 historical paired polls, this pollster's D-margins track the rater consensus (Cook / Sabato / IE / 538 / DDHQ etc.) with high correlation (r ≥ 0.85) and small mean delta (|Δ| ≤ 2pt). Their results align with conventional wisdom.
Debbie Stabenow 49.0 · John James 42.0pollarch
10/22/2018The Tarrance Group3.77(D+1.1)605±4.1unknown
commissioned by R-aligned: Internal R-aligned3 scored polls+3
  • commissioned by R-aligned: Internal R-aligned
    This poll was commissioned by a Republican-aligned committee, party, or PAC (Internal R-aligned). Such polls historically lean toward their sponsor.
  • 3 scored polls
    Pollster has only 3 historical polls with a known outcome to score against — too few for stable accuracy estimates.
  • 2757d old
    Poll was fielded 2757 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • high variance vs editorial consensus
    Stdev of (poll − rater consensus) across 5 historical paired polls exceeds 8pt — this pollster's results swing widely relative to where the editors place the same races.
  • weight 3.77
    Aggregation weight is 3.77 (1.0 ≈ average). Weight is a derived metric combining historical accuracy, methodology, and recency.
Debbie Stabenow 48.0 · John James 41.0pollarch
10/22/2018Michigan State University1.00169unknown
no scored pollsn=169+1
  • no scored polls
    Pollster has no historical polls with a known outcome in our database, so accuracy and bias cannot be measured.
  • n=169
    Sample size of 169 respondents implies a margin of error around ±7.5pt — wider than typical.
  • 2757d old
    Poll was fielded 2757 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
Debbie Stabenow 49.0 · John James 42.0pollarch
10/18/2018Marketing Resource Group1.00600±4.0unknown
no scored polls2761d old
  • no scored polls
    Pollster has no historical polls with a known outcome in our database, so accuracy and bias cannot be measured.
  • 2761d old
    Poll was fielded 2761 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
Debbie Stabenow 53.0 · John James 37.0pollarch
10/7/2018Mitchell Research1.09neutral(R+0.0)654±3.8unknown
2772d oldbias R+0.0pt
  • 2772d old
    Poll was fielded 2772 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • bias R+0.0pt
    Across 17 historical scored polls the average error vs. actual margin is R+0.0pt.
Debbie Stabenow 51.0 · John James 42.0pollarch
10/2/2018Glengariff Group0.81L(D+4.6)600±4.0unknown
2777d oldtracks editorial consensus
  • 2777d old
    Poll was fielded 2777 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • tracks editorial consensus
    Across 15 historical paired polls, this pollster's D-margins track the rater consensus (Cook / Sabato / IE / 538 / DDHQ etc.) with high correlation (r ≥ 0.85) and small mean delta (|Δ| ≤ 2pt). Their results align with conventional wisdom.
Debbie Stabenow 53.0 · John James 35.0pollarch
9/25/2018EPIC MRA1.00(D+0.8)600±4.0unknown
2784d oldtracks editorial consensus
  • 2784d old
    Poll was fielded 2784 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • tracks editorial consensus
    Across 13 historical paired polls, this pollster's D-margins track the rater consensus (Cook / Sabato / IE / 538 / DDHQ etc.) with high correlation (r ≥ 0.85) and small mean delta (|Δ| ≤ 2pt). Their results align with conventional wisdom.
Debbie Stabenow 56.0 · John James 33.0pollarch
9/24/2018Ipsos1.00(R+1.9)1150±3.0unknown
2785d oldtracks editorial consensus
  • 2785d old
    Poll was fielded 2785 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • tracks editorial consensus
    Across 16 historical paired polls, this pollster's D-margins track the rater consensus (Cook / Sabato / IE / 538 / DDHQ etc.) with high correlation (r ≥ 0.85) and small mean delta (|Δ| ≤ 2pt). Their results align with conventional wisdom.
Debbie Stabenow 55.0 · John James 35.0pollarch
9/14/2018Target Insyght1.00800±3.0unknown
no scored polls2795d old
  • no scored polls
    Pollster has no historical polls with a known outcome in our database, so accuracy and bias cannot be measured.
  • 2795d old
    Poll was fielded 2795 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
Debbie Stabenow 55.0 · John James 40.0pollarch
9/13/2018Mitchell Research1.09neutral(R+0.0)1009±3.0unknown
2796d oldbias R+0.0pt
  • 2796d old
    Poll was fielded 2796 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • bias R+0.0pt
    Across 17 historical scored polls the average error vs. actual margin is R+0.0pt.
Debbie Stabenow 54.0 · John James 41.0pollarch
9/9/2018Strategic National1.00R1000±3.1unknown
commissioned by R-aligned: Internal R-alignedno scored polls+1
  • commissioned by R-aligned: Internal R-aligned
    This poll was commissioned by a Republican-aligned committee, party, or PAC (Internal R-aligned). Such polls historically lean toward their sponsor.
  • no scored polls
    Pollster has no historical polls with a known outcome in our database, so accuracy and bias cannot be measured.
  • 2800d old
    Poll was fielded 2800 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
Debbie Stabenow 53.0 · John James 35.0pollarch
9/7/2018Glengariff Group0.81L(D+4.6)600±4.0unknown
2802d oldtracks editorial consensus
  • 2802d old
    Poll was fielded 2802 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • tracks editorial consensus
    Across 15 historical paired polls, this pollster's D-margins track the rater consensus (Cook / Sabato / IE / 538 / DDHQ etc.) with high correlation (r ≥ 0.85) and small mean delta (|Δ| ≤ 2pt). Their results align with conventional wisdom.
Debbie Stabenow 56.0 · John James 33.0pollarch
8/16/2018Gravis Marketing0.72L(D+2.9)647±3.9unknown
bias D+2.9pt2824d old+1
  • bias D+2.9pt
    Across 33 historical scored polls the average error vs. actual margin is D+2.9pt.
  • 2824d old
    Poll was fielded 2824 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • uncorrelated with editorial consensus
    Across 49 historical paired polls, this pollster's margins don't track the editorial consensus (Pearson r < 0.5). Independence from consensus is informational — could indicate genuine methodological independence or noisy results.
Debbie Stabenow 51.0 · John James 35.0pollarch
8/14/2018Strategic National1.00R700±3.7unknown
commissioned by R-aligned: Internal R-alignedno scored polls+1
  • commissioned by R-aligned: Internal R-aligned
    This poll was commissioned by a Republican-aligned committee, party, or PAC (Internal R-aligned). Such polls historically lean toward their sponsor.
  • no scored polls
    Pollster has no historical polls with a known outcome in our database, so accuracy and bias cannot be measured.
  • 2826d old
    Poll was fielded 2826 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
Debbie Stabenow 50.0 · John James 35.0pollarch
8/14/2018The Tarrance Group3.77(D+1.1)602±4.1unknown
commissioned by R-aligned: Internal R-aligned3 scored polls+3
  • commissioned by R-aligned: Internal R-aligned
    This poll was commissioned by a Republican-aligned committee, party, or PAC (Internal R-aligned). Such polls historically lean toward their sponsor.
  • 3 scored polls
    Pollster has only 3 historical polls with a known outcome to score against — too few for stable accuracy estimates.
  • 2826d old
    Poll was fielded 2826 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • high variance vs editorial consensus
    Stdev of (poll − rater consensus) across 5 historical paired polls exceeds 8pt — this pollster's results swing widely relative to where the editors place the same races.
  • weight 3.77
    Aggregation weight is 3.77 (1.0 ≈ average). Weight is a derived metric combining historical accuracy, methodology, and recency.
Debbie Stabenow 49.0 · John James 38.0pollarch
7/21/2018Emerson College1.00(D+0.7)600±4.3unknown
2850d oldtracks editorial consensus+1
  • 2850d old
    Poll was fielded 2850 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • tracks editorial consensus
    Across 234 historical paired polls, this pollster's D-margins track the rater consensus (Cook / Sabato / IE / 538 / DDHQ etc.) with high correlation (r ≥ 0.85) and small mean delta (|Δ| ≤ 2pt). Their results align with conventional wisdom.
  • accurate · bias D+0.7pt
    Across 117 historical scored polls this pollster's average error vs. actual margin is D+0.7pt — within ±1pt.
Debbie Stabenow 47.0 · John James 29.0pollarch
7/21/2018Emerson College1.00(D+0.7)600±4.3unknown
2850d oldtracks editorial consensus+1
  • 2850d old
    Poll was fielded 2850 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • tracks editorial consensus
    Across 234 historical paired polls, this pollster's D-margins track the rater consensus (Cook / Sabato / IE / 538 / DDHQ etc.) with high correlation (r ≥ 0.85) and small mean delta (|Δ| ≤ 2pt). Their results align with conventional wisdom.
  • accurate · bias D+0.7pt
    Across 117 historical scored polls this pollster's average error vs. actual margin is D+0.7pt — within ±1pt.
Debbie Stabenow 48.0 · Sandy Pensler 32.0pollarch
7/19/2018Marist College1.00(D+2.4)886±3.9unknown
bias D+2.4pt2852d old+1
  • bias D+2.4pt
    Across 20 historical scored polls the average error vs. actual margin is D+2.4pt.
  • 2852d old
    Poll was fielded 2852 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • tracks editorial consensus
    Across 44 historical paired polls, this pollster's D-margins track the rater consensus (Cook / Sabato / IE / 538 / DDHQ etc.) with high correlation (r ≥ 0.85) and small mean delta (|Δ| ≤ 2pt). Their results align with conventional wisdom.
Debbie Stabenow 55.0 · John James 37.0pollarch
7/19/2018Marist College1.00(D+2.4)886±3.9unknown
bias D+2.4pt2852d old+1
  • bias D+2.4pt
    Across 20 historical scored polls the average error vs. actual margin is D+2.4pt.
  • 2852d old
    Poll was fielded 2852 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • tracks editorial consensus
    Across 44 historical paired polls, this pollster's D-margins track the rater consensus (Cook / Sabato / IE / 538 / DDHQ etc.) with high correlation (r ≥ 0.85) and small mean delta (|Δ| ≤ 2pt). Their results align with conventional wisdom.
Debbie Stabenow 52.0 · Sandy Pensler 37.0pollarch
7/2/2018SurveyMonkey/Axios1.00978±5.0unknown
no scored polls2869d old+1
  • no scored polls
    Pollster has no historical polls with a known outcome in our database, so accuracy and bias cannot be measured.
  • 2869d old
    Poll was fielded 2869 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • newspaper-sponsored: Axios
    Commissioned by Axios, an independent media or academic sponsor. Independent sponsorship doesn't guarantee accuracy but rules out direct campaign funding.
Debbie Stabenow 54.0 · John James 42.0pollarch
7/2/2018SurveyMonkey/Axios1.00978±5.0unknown
no scored polls2869d old+1
  • no scored polls
    Pollster has no historical polls with a known outcome in our database, so accuracy and bias cannot be measured.
  • 2869d old
    Poll was fielded 2869 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • newspaper-sponsored: Axios
    Commissioned by Axios, an independent media or academic sponsor. Independent sponsorship doesn't guarantee accuracy but rules out direct campaign funding.
Debbie Stabenow 53.0 · Sandy Pensler 41.0pollarch
3/5/2018SurveyMonkey/Axios1.002012±3.8unknown
no scored polls2988d old+2
  • no scored polls
    Pollster has no historical polls with a known outcome in our database, so accuracy and bias cannot be measured.
  • 2988d old
    Poll was fielded 2988 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • newspaper-sponsored: Axios
    Commissioned by Axios, an independent media or academic sponsor. Independent sponsorship doesn't guarantee accuracy but rules out direct campaign funding.
  • n=2,012
    Sample size of 2,012 respondents implies a margin of error around ±2.2pt — tighter than the ~600-respondent typical.
Debbie Stabenow 49.0pollarch
1/19/2018Glengariff Group0.81L(D+4.6)600±4.0unknown
3033d oldtracks editorial consensus
  • 3033d old
    Poll was fielded 3033 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • tracks editorial consensus
    Across 15 historical paired polls, this pollster's D-margins track the rater consensus (Cook / Sabato / IE / 538 / DDHQ etc.) with high correlation (r ≥ 0.85) and small mean delta (|Δ| ≤ 2pt). Their results align with conventional wisdom.
Debbie Stabenow 51.0 · John James 30.0pollarch
1/19/2018Glengariff Group0.81L(D+4.6)600±4.0unknown
3033d oldtracks editorial consensus
  • 3033d old
    Poll was fielded 3033 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • tracks editorial consensus
    Across 15 historical paired polls, this pollster's D-margins track the rater consensus (Cook / Sabato / IE / 538 / DDHQ etc.) with high correlation (r ≥ 0.85) and small mean delta (|Δ| ≤ 2pt). Their results align with conventional wisdom.
Debbie Stabenow 51.0 · Sandy Pensler 30.0pollarch
10/1/2017Mitchell/Rosetta Stone1.00558±4.2unknown
no scored polls3143d old
  • no scored polls
    Pollster has no historical polls with a known outcome in our database, so accuracy and bias cannot be measured.
  • 3143d old
    Poll was fielded 3143 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
Debbie Stabenow 46.0 · Robert Ritchie 38.0pollarch
9/19/2017Zogby Analytics1.00(D+4.0)800±3.4unknown
3 scored polls3155d old
  • 3 scored polls
    Pollster has only 3 historical polls with a known outcome to score against — too few for stable accuracy estimates.
  • 3155d old
    Poll was fielded 3155 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
Debbie Stabenow 46.0 · Robert Ritchie 36.0pollarch
9/18/2017Marketing Resource Group1.00600±4.0unknown
no scored polls3156d old
  • no scored polls
    Pollster has no historical polls with a known outcome in our database, so accuracy and bias cannot be measured.
  • 3156d old
    Poll was fielded 3156 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
Debbie Stabenow 52.0 · Robert Ritchie 34.0pollarch
7/27/2017Target Insyght1.00822±3.5unknown
no scored polls3209d old
  • no scored polls
    Pollster has no historical polls with a known outcome in our database, so accuracy and bias cannot be measured.
  • 3209d old
    Poll was fielded 3209 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
Debbie Stabenow 50.0 · Robert Ritchie 42.0pollarch
7/27/2017Trafalgar Group1.00(R+2.1)1078±3.1unknown
methodology not disclosedcommissioned by R-aligned: Internal R-aligned+2
  • methodology not disclosed
    Methodology not disclosed publicly; declined to participate in AAPOR Transparency Initiative. Included for transparency rather than weight-zeroing — many forecasters still include their polls — but the methodology opacity is worth surfacing. Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trafalgar_Group
  • commissioned by R-aligned: Internal R-aligned
    This poll was commissioned by a Republican-aligned committee, party, or PAC (Internal R-aligned). Such polls historically lean toward their sponsor.
  • 3209d old
    Poll was fielded 3209 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • R+4.1pt vs editors
    Across 7 historical polls where ≥2 editorial raters had rated the race (Cook / Sabato / IE / 538 / DDHQ etc.), this pollster's D-margin averaged 4.1pt MORE R-favorable than the rater consensus. Systematic R-lean relative to conventional wisdom.
Debbie Stabenow 46.0 · Robert Ritchie 49.0pollarch

Trust signals are deterministic flags computed from the pollster scorecard (track-record size, historical bias, aggregation weight) and the poll itself (sample size, population, age, citation availability). No interpretation; click any row to see the cited numbers behind each flag.

Endorsements

Source · Wikipedia · 7 total
Debbie Stabenow (D)
7 endorsements · source
Organizations / unions (3)
  • League of Conservation Voters — [ 9 ]
  • National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare — [ 11 ]
  • Natural Resources Defense Council — [ 9 ]
Individuals / celebrities (1)
  • Chelsea Handler — actress and television personality [ 13 ]
Other (3)
  • EMILY's List — [ 8 ]
  • Sierra Club — [ 12 ]
  • [ 10 ] — t [ 10 ]

Editorial ratings · poll-vs-rater

4 raters
Rater Rating Updated Poll D-marg. Rater marg. Δ poll−rater
The Cook Political Report Likely D Oct 26 +9.0
Inside Elections Safe D Nov 1 +18.0
RealClearPolitics Lean D Nov 5 +3.5
Sabato's Crystal Ball Safe D Nov 5 +18.0

Δ POLL−RATER = polling-consensus margin minus the rater's implied bucket midpoint. Positive = polls more D than rater; negative = rater more D than polls. |Δ| < 0.6 well-aligned · 0.6–1.5 mild divergence · ≥1.5 contested call.

last poll 91 months ago (11/5/2018) last market quote rating computed 1 day ago
Rating history (1 change)
  • 5/6/2026 Tossup via pvi