Races · Senate · 2016 · PA
Senate · class II · open seat

Katie McGinty vs Pat Toomey

Tilt R · 117 polls · 0 markets Last poll 3471d ago Rating 1d ago
Caution · early warning
Editorial raters moved while polling has gone quiet

The last rating change here was 1d ago, but only 117 polls have landed in the last 60 days. When raters move and pollsters don't, the rating shift may be running ahead of the data. Watch for a late-cycle correction in either direction.

Where this race stands
Verified

Tilt R

tilt-r

Polling average

Simple Weighted House-corrected Trimmed LOESS Kalman
Method:Weighted, plus each pollster's measured bias subtracted before averaging.
|Toggle:

All polls · 117 results

117 of 117 polls
EndPollsterWeightLeanSampleMoEPopTrust signalsResultsSource
11/7/2016SurveyMonkey1.00(D+6.1)2845±4.6unknown
historical bias D+6.1pt3471d old+2
  • historical bias D+6.1pt
    Across 236 historical scored polls the average error vs. actual margin is D+6.1pt — a measurable house effect.
  • 3471d old
    Poll was fielded 3471 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • high variance vs editorial consensus
    Stdev of (poll − rater consensus) across 236 historical paired polls exceeds 8pt — this pollster's results swing widely relative to where the editors place the same races.
  • n=2,845
    Sample size of 2,845 respondents implies a margin of error around ±1.8pt — tighter than the ~600-respondent typical.
Pat Toomey 45.0 · Katie McGinty 49.0pollarch
11/6/2016SurveyMonkey1.00(D+6.1)2685±4.6unknown
historical bias D+6.1pt3472d old+2
  • historical bias D+6.1pt
    Across 236 historical scored polls the average error vs. actual margin is D+6.1pt — a measurable house effect.
  • 3472d old
    Poll was fielded 3472 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • high variance vs editorial consensus
    Stdev of (poll − rater consensus) across 236 historical paired polls exceeds 8pt — this pollster's results swing widely relative to where the editors place the same races.
  • n=2,685
    Sample size of 2,685 respondents implies a margin of error around ±1.9pt — tighter than the ~600-respondent typical.
Pat Toomey 45.0 · Katie McGinty 50.0pollarch
11/5/2016CBS News/YouGov0.92L(D+3.4)931±4.3unknown
historical bias D+3.4pt3473d old+1
  • historical bias D+3.4pt
    Across 16 historical scored polls the average error vs. actual margin is D+3.4pt — a measurable house effect.
  • 3473d old
    Poll was fielded 3473 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • tracks editorial consensus
    Across 23 historical paired polls, this pollster's D-margins track the rater consensus (Cook / Sabato / IE / 538 / DDHQ etc.) with high correlation (r ≥ 0.85) and small mean delta (|Δ| ≤ 2pt). Their results align with conventional wisdom.
Pat Toomey 46.0 · Katie McGinty 47.0pollarch
11/4/2016Clarity Campaign Labs1.04L(D+3.9)1033±3.0unknown
3474d olduncorrelated with editorial consensus
  • 3474d old
    Poll was fielded 3474 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • uncorrelated with editorial consensus
    Across 16 historical paired polls, this pollster's margins don't track the editorial consensus (Pearson r < 0.5). Independence from consensus is informational — could indicate genuine methodological independence or noisy results.
Pat Toomey 43.0 · Katie McGinty 46.0pollarch
11/4/2016Muhlenberg College/Morning Call2.42(R+0.4)405±5.5unknown
3 scored polls3474d old+1
  • 3 scored polls
    Pollster has only 3 historical polls with a known outcome to score against — too few for stable accuracy estimates.
  • 3474d old
    Poll was fielded 3474 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • weight 2.42
    Aggregation weight is 2.42 (1.0 ≈ average). Weight is a derived metric combining historical accuracy, methodology, and recency.
Pat Toomey 43.0 · Katie McGinty 42.0pollarch
11/3/2016Harper Polling1.00504±4.4unknown
no scored polls3475d old
  • no scored polls
    Pollster has no historical polls with a known outcome in our database, so accuracy and bias cannot be measured.
  • 3475d old
    Poll was fielded 3475 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
Pat Toomey 44.0 · Katie McGinty 44.0 · Edward Clifford 6.0pollarch
11/3/2016SurveyMonkey1.00(D+6.1)2454±4.6unknown
historical bias D+6.1pt3475d old+2
  • historical bias D+6.1pt
    Across 236 historical scored polls the average error vs. actual margin is D+6.1pt — a measurable house effect.
  • 3475d old
    Poll was fielded 3475 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • high variance vs editorial consensus
    Stdev of (poll − rater consensus) across 236 historical paired polls exceeds 8pt — this pollster's results swing widely relative to where the editors place the same races.
  • n=2,454
    Sample size of 2,454 respondents implies a margin of error around ±2.0pt — tighter than the ~600-respondent typical.
Pat Toomey 45.0 · Katie McGinty 50.0pollarch
11/2/2016Breitbart/Gravis Marketing0.74L(D+4.2)1016±3.1unknown
3476d oldtracks editorial consensus
  • 3476d old
    Poll was fielded 3476 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • tracks editorial consensus
    Across 11 historical paired polls, this pollster's D-margins track the rater consensus (Cook / Sabato / IE / 538 / DDHQ etc.) with high correlation (r ≥ 0.85) and small mean delta (|Δ| ≤ 2pt). Their results align with conventional wisdom.
Pat Toomey 43.0 · Katie McGinty 45.0pollarch
11/2/2016Susquehanna Polling & Research1.12neutral(D+0.1)681±3.8unknown
3476d old
  • 3476d old
    Poll was fielded 3476 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
Pat Toomey 41.0 · Katie McGinty 47.0 · Edward Clifford 5.0pollarch
11/2/2016SurveyMonkey1.00(D+6.1)2177±4.6unknown
historical bias D+6.1pt3476d old+2
  • historical bias D+6.1pt
    Across 236 historical scored polls the average error vs. actual margin is D+6.1pt — a measurable house effect.
  • 3476d old
    Poll was fielded 3476 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • high variance vs editorial consensus
    Stdev of (poll − rater consensus) across 236 historical paired polls exceeds 8pt — this pollster's results swing widely relative to where the editors place the same races.
  • n=2,177
    Sample size of 2,177 respondents implies a margin of error around ±2.1pt — tighter than the ~600-respondent typical.
Pat Toomey 46.0 · Katie McGinty 50.0pollarch
11/2/2016SurveyMonkey1.00(D+6.1)2078±4.6unknown
historical bias D+6.1pt3476d old+2
  • historical bias D+6.1pt
    Across 236 historical scored polls the average error vs. actual margin is D+6.1pt — a measurable house effect.
  • 3476d old
    Poll was fielded 3476 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • high variance vs editorial consensus
    Stdev of (poll − rater consensus) across 236 historical paired polls exceeds 8pt — this pollster's results swing widely relative to where the editors place the same races.
  • n=2,078
    Sample size of 2,078 respondents implies a margin of error around ±2.1pt — tighter than the ~600-respondent typical.
Pat Toomey 46.0 · Katie McGinty 50.0pollarch
11/1/2016Public Policy Polling1.00(D+1.1)1050±3.0unknown
3477d olduncorrelated with editorial consensus+1
  • 3477d old
    Poll was fielded 3477 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • uncorrelated with editorial consensus
    Across 368 historical paired polls, this pollster's margins don't track the editorial consensus (Pearson r < 0.5). Independence from consensus is informational — could indicate genuine methodological independence or noisy results.
  • bias D+1.1pt
    Across 72 historical scored polls the average error vs. actual margin is D+1.1pt.
Pat Toomey 44.0 · Katie McGinty 46.0pollarch
11/1/2016Monmouth University1.00(D+5.0)403±4.9unknown
historical bias D+5.0pt3477d old+1
  • historical bias D+5.0pt
    Across 19 historical scored polls the average error vs. actual margin is D+5.0pt — a measurable house effect.
  • 3477d old
    Poll was fielded 3477 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • tracks editorial consensus
    Across 30 historical paired polls, this pollster's D-margins track the rater consensus (Cook / Sabato / IE / 538 / DDHQ etc.) with high correlation (r ≥ 0.85) and small mean delta (|Δ| ≤ 2pt). Their results align with conventional wisdom.
Pat Toomey 44.0 · Katie McGinty 47.0 · Edward Clifford 3.0pollarch
11/1/2016CNN/ORC1.27(D+1.2)799±3.5LV
3477d oldlikely-voter screen+1
  • 3477d old
    Poll was fielded 3477 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • likely-voter screen
    Likely-voter screen — pollster filters respondents by reported turnout intent. Generally tighter for predicting elections than registered- or adult-population polls.
  • tracks editorial consensus
    Across 12 historical paired polls, this pollster's D-margins track the rater consensus (Cook / Sabato / IE / 538 / DDHQ etc.) with high correlation (r ≥ 0.85) and small mean delta (|Δ| ≤ 2pt). Their results align with conventional wisdom.
Pat Toomey 46.0 · Katie McGinty 51.0pollarch
11/1/2016Quinnipiac University1.00(D+1.9)612±4.0unknown
3477d oldtracks editorial consensus
  • 3477d old
    Poll was fielded 3477 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • tracks editorial consensus
    Across 81 historical paired polls, this pollster's D-margins track the rater consensus (Cook / Sabato / IE / 538 / DDHQ etc.) with high correlation (r ≥ 0.85) and small mean delta (|Δ| ≤ 2pt). Their results align with conventional wisdom.
Pat Toomey 47.0 · Katie McGinty 48.0pollarch
10/31/2016SurveyMonkey1.00(D+6.1)2255±4.6unknown
historical bias D+6.1pt3478d old+2
  • historical bias D+6.1pt
    Across 236 historical scored polls the average error vs. actual margin is D+6.1pt — a measurable house effect.
  • 3478d old
    Poll was fielded 3478 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • high variance vs editorial consensus
    Stdev of (poll − rater consensus) across 236 historical paired polls exceeds 8pt — this pollster's results swing widely relative to where the editors place the same races.
  • n=2,255
    Sample size of 2,255 respondents implies a margin of error around ±2.1pt — tighter than the ~600-respondent typical.
Pat Toomey 46.0 · Katie McGinty 49.0pollarch
10/30/2016Franklin & Marshall College0.91L(D+4.4)652±5.1LV
3479d oldD+4.7pt vs editors+1
  • 3479d old
    Poll was fielded 3479 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • D+4.7pt vs editors
    Across 15 historical polls where ≥2 editorial raters had rated the race (Cook / Sabato / IE / 538 / DDHQ etc.), this pollster's D-margin averaged 4.7pt MORE D-favorable than the rater consensus. Systematic D-lean relative to conventional wisdom.
  • likely-voter screen
    Likely-voter screen — pollster filters respondents by reported turnout intent. Generally tighter for predicting elections than registered- or adult-population polls.
Pat Toomey 35.0 · Katie McGinty 47.0 · Edward Clifford 1.0pollarch
10/30/2016Breitbart/Gravis Marketing0.74L(D+4.2)3217±1.7unknown
3479d oldn=3,217+1
  • 3479d old
    Poll was fielded 3479 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • n=3,217
    Sample size of 3,217 respondents implies a margin of error around ±1.7pt — tighter than the ~600-respondent typical.
  • tracks editorial consensus
    Across 11 historical paired polls, this pollster's D-margins track the rater consensus (Cook / Sabato / IE / 538 / DDHQ etc.) with high correlation (r ≥ 0.85) and small mean delta (|Δ| ≤ 2pt). Their results align with conventional wisdom.
Pat Toomey 41.0 · Katie McGinty 45.0pollarch
10/28/2016CBS News/YouGov0.92L(D+3.4)1091±3.7unknown
historical bias D+3.4pt3481d old+1
  • historical bias D+3.4pt
    Across 16 historical scored polls the average error vs. actual margin is D+3.4pt — a measurable house effect.
  • 3481d old
    Poll was fielded 3481 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • tracks editorial consensus
    Across 23 historical paired polls, this pollster's D-margins track the rater consensus (Cook / Sabato / IE / 538 / DDHQ etc.) with high correlation (r ≥ 0.85) and small mean delta (|Δ| ≤ 2pt). Their results align with conventional wisdom.
Pat Toomey 41.0 · Katie McGinty 44.0pollarch
10/26/2016Emerson College1.00(D+0.7)550±4.1unknown
3483d oldtracks editorial consensus+1
  • 3483d old
    Poll was fielded 3483 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • tracks editorial consensus
    Across 234 historical paired polls, this pollster's D-margins track the rater consensus (Cook / Sabato / IE / 538 / DDHQ etc.) with high correlation (r ≥ 0.85) and small mean delta (|Δ| ≤ 2pt). Their results align with conventional wisdom.
  • accurate · bias D+0.7pt
    Across 117 historical scored polls this pollster's average error vs. actual margin is D+0.7pt — within ±1pt.
Pat Toomey 43.0 · Katie McGinty 45.0pollarch
10/26/2016Muhlenberg College/Morning Call2.42(R+0.4)420±5.5unknown
3 scored polls3483d old+1
  • 3 scored polls
    Pollster has only 3 historical polls with a known outcome to score against — too few for stable accuracy estimates.
  • 3483d old
    Poll was fielded 3483 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • weight 2.42
    Aggregation weight is 2.42 (1.0 ≈ average). Weight is a derived metric combining historical accuracy, methodology, and recency.
Pat Toomey 41.0 · Katie McGinty 41.0pollarch
10/25/2016New York Times Upshot/Siena College1.01L(D+3.5)824±3.4unknown
3484d olduniversity-sponsored: Siena College
  • 3484d old
    Poll was fielded 3484 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • university-sponsored: Siena College
    Commissioned by Siena College, an independent media or academic sponsor. Independent sponsorship doesn't guarantee accuracy but rules out direct campaign funding.
Pat Toomey 44.0 · Katie McGinty 47.0pollarch
10/19/2016Emerson College1.00(D+0.7)800±3.4unknown
3490d oldtracks editorial consensus+1
  • 3490d old
    Poll was fielded 3490 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • tracks editorial consensus
    Across 234 historical paired polls, this pollster's D-margins track the rater consensus (Cook / Sabato / IE / 538 / DDHQ etc.) with high correlation (r ≥ 0.85) and small mean delta (|Δ| ≤ 2pt). Their results align with conventional wisdom.
  • accurate · bias D+0.7pt
    Across 117 historical scored polls this pollster's average error vs. actual margin is D+0.7pt — within ±1pt.
Pat Toomey 46.0 · Katie McGinty 43.0pollarch
10/16/2016Quinnipiac University1.00(D+1.9)660±3.8unknown
3493d oldtracks editorial consensus
  • 3493d old
    Poll was fielded 3493 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • tracks editorial consensus
    Across 81 historical paired polls, this pollster's D-margins track the rater consensus (Cook / Sabato / IE / 538 / DDHQ etc.) with high correlation (r ≥ 0.85) and small mean delta (|Δ| ≤ 2pt). Their results align with conventional wisdom.
Pat Toomey 49.0 · Katie McGinty 45.0pollarch
10/16/2016Washington Post/SurveyMonkey1.001449±0.5unknown
no scored polls3493d old+1
  • no scored polls
    Pollster has no historical polls with a known outcome in our database, so accuracy and bias cannot be measured.
  • 3493d old
    Poll was fielded 3493 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • D+5.0pt vs editors
    Across 12 historical polls where ≥2 editorial raters had rated the race (Cook / Sabato / IE / 538 / DDHQ etc.), this pollster's D-margin averaged 5.0pt MORE D-favorable than the rater consensus. Systematic D-lean relative to conventional wisdom.
Pat Toomey 47.0 · Katie McGinty 47.0pollarch
10/11/2016Bloomberg/Selzer1.00806±3.5unknown
no scored polls3498d old
  • no scored polls
    Pollster has no historical polls with a known outcome in our database, so accuracy and bias cannot be measured.
  • 3498d old
    Poll was fielded 3498 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
Pat Toomey 45.0 · Katie McGinty 47.0pollarch
10/10/2016The Times-Picayune/Lucid1.01L(D+4.0)1457±3.0unknown
3499d old
  • 3499d old
    Poll was fielded 3499 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
Pat Toomey 44.0 · Katie McGinty 44.0pollarch
10/9/2016Susquehanna Polling & Research1.12neutral(D+0.1)764±3.5unknown
3500d old
  • 3500d old
    Poll was fielded 3500 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
Pat Toomey 42.0 · Katie McGinty 38.0 · Edward Clifford 7.0pollarch
10/7/2016CBS News/YouGov0.92L(D+3.4)997±4.2unknown
historical bias D+3.4pt3502d old+1
  • historical bias D+3.4pt
    Across 16 historical scored polls the average error vs. actual margin is D+3.4pt — a measurable house effect.
  • 3502d old
    Poll was fielded 3502 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • tracks editorial consensus
    Across 23 historical paired polls, this pollster's D-margins track the rater consensus (Cook / Sabato / IE / 538 / DDHQ etc.) with high correlation (r ≥ 0.85) and small mean delta (|Δ| ≤ 2pt). Their results align with conventional wisdom.
Pat Toomey 42.0 · Katie McGinty 42.0pollarch
10/6/2016NBC/WSJ/Marist1.20neutral(R+0.7)709±3.7unknown
3503d oldbias R+0.7pt+1
  • 3503d old
    Poll was fielded 3503 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • bias R+0.7pt
    Across 13 historical scored polls the average error vs. actual margin is R+0.7pt.
  • tracks editorial consensus
    Across 16 historical paired polls, this pollster's D-margins track the rater consensus (Cook / Sabato / IE / 538 / DDHQ etc.) with high correlation (r ≥ 0.85) and small mean delta (|Δ| ≤ 2pt). Their results align with conventional wisdom.
Pat Toomey 44.0 · Katie McGinty 48.0pollarch
10/3/2016Monmouth University1.00(D+5.0)402±4.9unknown
historical bias D+5.0pt3506d old+1
  • historical bias D+5.0pt
    Across 19 historical scored polls the average error vs. actual margin is D+5.0pt — a measurable house effect.
  • 3506d old
    Poll was fielded 3506 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • tracks editorial consensus
    Across 30 historical paired polls, this pollster's D-margins track the rater consensus (Cook / Sabato / IE / 538 / DDHQ etc.) with high correlation (r ≥ 0.85) and small mean delta (|Δ| ≤ 2pt). Their results align with conventional wisdom.
Pat Toomey 46.0 · Katie McGinty 46.0 · Edward Clifford 3.0pollarch
10/2/2016Franklin & Marshall College0.91L(D+4.4)496±6.1LV
3507d oldD+4.7pt vs editors+1
  • 3507d old
    Poll was fielded 3507 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • D+4.7pt vs editors
    Across 15 historical polls where ≥2 editorial raters had rated the race (Cook / Sabato / IE / 538 / DDHQ etc.), this pollster's D-margin averaged 4.7pt MORE D-favorable than the rater consensus. Systematic D-lean relative to conventional wisdom.
  • likely-voter screen
    Likely-voter screen — pollster filters respondents by reported turnout intent. Generally tighter for predicting elections than registered- or adult-population polls.
Pat Toomey 35.0 · Katie McGinty 41.0 · Edward Clifford 2.0pollarch
10/2/2016Quinnipiac University1.00(D+1.9)535±4.2unknown
3507d oldtracks editorial consensus
  • 3507d old
    Poll was fielded 3507 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • tracks editorial consensus
    Across 81 historical paired polls, this pollster's D-margins track the rater consensus (Cook / Sabato / IE / 538 / DDHQ etc.) with high correlation (r ≥ 0.85) and small mean delta (|Δ| ≤ 2pt). Their results align with conventional wisdom.
Pat Toomey 50.0 · Katie McGinty 42.0pollarch
9/28/2016Public Policy Polling1.00(D+1.1)886±3.3unknown
3511d olduncorrelated with editorial consensus+1
  • 3511d old
    Poll was fielded 3511 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • uncorrelated with editorial consensus
    Across 368 historical paired polls, this pollster's margins don't track the editorial consensus (Pearson r < 0.5). Independence from consensus is informational — could indicate genuine methodological independence or noisy results.
  • bias D+1.1pt
    Across 72 historical scored polls the average error vs. actual margin is D+1.1pt.
Pat Toomey 35.0 · Katie McGinty 40.0 · Edward Clifford 9.0pollarch
9/25/2016CNN/ORC1.27(D+1.2)771±3.5LV
3514d oldlikely-voter screen+1
  • 3514d old
    Poll was fielded 3514 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • likely-voter screen
    Likely-voter screen — pollster filters respondents by reported turnout intent. Generally tighter for predicting elections than registered- or adult-population polls.
  • tracks editorial consensus
    Across 12 historical paired polls, this pollster's D-margins track the rater consensus (Cook / Sabato / IE / 538 / DDHQ etc.) with high correlation (r ≥ 0.85) and small mean delta (|Δ| ≤ 2pt). Their results align with conventional wisdom.
Pat Toomey 46.0 · Katie McGinty 49.0pollarch
9/23/2016Breitbart/Gravis Marketing0.74L(D+4.2)949±3.2unknown
3516d oldtracks editorial consensus
  • 3516d old
    Poll was fielded 3516 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • tracks editorial consensus
    Across 11 historical paired polls, this pollster's D-margins track the rater consensus (Cook / Sabato / IE / 538 / DDHQ etc.) with high correlation (r ≥ 0.85) and small mean delta (|Δ| ≤ 2pt). Their results align with conventional wisdom.
Pat Toomey 39.0 · Katie McGinty 43.0pollarch
9/23/2016Muhlenberg College/Morning Call2.42(R+0.4)486±5.0unknown
3 scored polls3516d old+1
  • 3 scored polls
    Pollster has only 3 historical polls with a known outcome to score against — too few for stable accuracy estimates.
  • 3516d old
    Poll was fielded 3516 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • weight 2.42
    Aggregation weight is 2.42 (1.0 ≈ average). Weight is a derived metric combining historical accuracy, methodology, and recency.
Pat Toomey 41.0 · Katie McGinty 40.0pollarch
9/23/2016Mercyhurst University1.00420±4.8unknown
no scored polls3516d old
  • no scored polls
    Pollster has no historical polls with a known outcome in our database, so accuracy and bias cannot be measured.
  • 3516d old
    Poll was fielded 3516 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
Pat Toomey 43.0 · Katie McGinty 42.0pollarch
9/22/2016Harper Polling1.00500±4.4unknown
no scored polls3517d old
  • no scored polls
    Pollster has no historical polls with a known outcome in our database, so accuracy and bias cannot be measured.
  • 3517d old
    Poll was fielded 3517 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
Pat Toomey 42.0 · Katie McGinty 42.0 · Edward Clifford 8.0pollarch
9/19/2016Greenberg Quinlan Rosner - Democracy Corps1.00400±4.0unknown
no scored polls3520d old
  • no scored polls
    Pollster has no historical polls with a known outcome in our database, so accuracy and bias cannot be measured.
  • 3520d old
    Poll was fielded 3520 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
Pat Toomey 45.0 · Katie McGinty 43.0pollarch
9/16/2016Muhlenberg College/Morning Call2.42(R+0.4)405±5.5unknown
3 scored polls3523d old+1
  • 3 scored polls
    Pollster has only 3 historical polls with a known outcome to score against — too few for stable accuracy estimates.
  • 3523d old
    Poll was fielded 3523 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • weight 2.42
    Aggregation weight is 2.42 (1.0 ≈ average). Weight is a derived metric combining historical accuracy, methodology, and recency.
Pat Toomey 38.0 · Katie McGinty 43.0pollarch
9/7/2016Quinnipiac University1.00(D+1.9)778±3.5unknown
3532d oldtracks editorial consensus
  • 3532d old
    Poll was fielded 3532 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • tracks editorial consensus
    Across 81 historical paired polls, this pollster's D-margins track the rater consensus (Cook / Sabato / IE / 538 / DDHQ etc.) with high correlation (r ≥ 0.85) and small mean delta (|Δ| ≤ 2pt). Their results align with conventional wisdom.
Pat Toomey 46.0 · Katie McGinty 45.0pollarch
9/2/2016CBS News/YouGov0.92L(D+3.4)1091±4.1unknown
historical bias D+3.4pt3537d old+1
  • historical bias D+3.4pt
    Across 16 historical scored polls the average error vs. actual margin is D+3.4pt — a measurable house effect.
  • 3537d old
    Poll was fielded 3537 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • tracks editorial consensus
    Across 23 historical paired polls, this pollster's D-margins track the rater consensus (Cook / Sabato / IE / 538 / DDHQ etc.) with high correlation (r ≥ 0.85) and small mean delta (|Δ| ≤ 2pt). Their results align with conventional wisdom.
Pat Toomey 39.0 · Katie McGinty 39.0pollarch
8/31/2016Public Policy Polling1.00(D+1.1)814±3.4unknown
3539d olduncorrelated with editorial consensus+1
  • 3539d old
    Poll was fielded 3539 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • uncorrelated with editorial consensus
    Across 368 historical paired polls, this pollster's margins don't track the editorial consensus (Pearson r < 0.5). Independence from consensus is informational — could indicate genuine methodological independence or noisy results.
  • bias D+1.1pt
    Across 72 historical scored polls the average error vs. actual margin is D+1.1pt.
Pat Toomey 41.0 · Katie McGinty 44.0pollarch
8/29/2016Monmouth University1.00(D+5.0)402±4.9unknown
historical bias D+5.0pt3541d old+1
  • historical bias D+5.0pt
    Across 19 historical scored polls the average error vs. actual margin is D+5.0pt — a measurable house effect.
  • 3541d old
    Poll was fielded 3541 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • tracks editorial consensus
    Across 30 historical paired polls, this pollster's D-margins track the rater consensus (Cook / Sabato / IE / 538 / DDHQ etc.) with high correlation (r ≥ 0.85) and small mean delta (|Δ| ≤ 2pt). Their results align with conventional wisdom.
Pat Toomey 41.0 · Katie McGinty 45.0 · Edward Clifford 6.0pollarch
8/29/2016Franklin & Marshall College0.91L(D+4.4)496±5.6LV
3541d oldD+4.7pt vs editors+1
  • 3541d old
    Poll was fielded 3541 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • D+4.7pt vs editors
    Across 15 historical polls where ≥2 editorial raters had rated the race (Cook / Sabato / IE / 538 / DDHQ etc.), this pollster's D-margin averaged 4.7pt MORE D-favorable than the rater consensus. Systematic D-lean relative to conventional wisdom.
  • likely-voter screen
    Likely-voter screen — pollster filters respondents by reported turnout intent. Generally tighter for predicting elections than registered- or adult-population polls.
Pat Toomey 38.0 · Katie McGinty 43.0pollarch
8/28/2016Emerson College1.00(D+0.7)800±3.4unknown
3542d oldtracks editorial consensus+1
  • 3542d old
    Poll was fielded 3542 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • tracks editorial consensus
    Across 234 historical paired polls, this pollster's D-margins track the rater consensus (Cook / Sabato / IE / 538 / DDHQ etc.) with high correlation (r ≥ 0.85) and small mean delta (|Δ| ≤ 2pt). Their results align with conventional wisdom.
  • accurate · bias D+0.7pt
    Across 117 historical scored polls this pollster's average error vs. actual margin is D+0.7pt — within ±1pt.
Pat Toomey 46.0 · Katie McGinty 39.0pollarch
8/28/2016GBA Strategies1.00881±4.4unknown
no scored polls3542d old
  • no scored polls
    Pollster has no historical polls with a known outcome in our database, so accuracy and bias cannot be measured.
  • 3542d old
    Poll was fielded 3542 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
Pat Toomey 42.0 · Katie McGinty 47.0pollarch
8/27/2016Public Policy Polling1.00(D+1.1)1194±3.0unknown
3543d olduncorrelated with editorial consensus+1
  • 3543d old
    Poll was fielded 3543 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • uncorrelated with editorial consensus
    Across 368 historical paired polls, this pollster's margins don't track the editorial consensus (Pearson r < 0.5). Independence from consensus is informational — could indicate genuine methodological independence or noisy results.
  • bias D+1.1pt
    Across 72 historical scored polls the average error vs. actual margin is D+1.1pt.
Pat Toomey 40.0 · Katie McGinty 46.0pollarch
8/7/2016Quinnipiac University1.00(D+1.9)815±3.4unknown
3563d oldtracks editorial consensus
  • 3563d old
    Poll was fielded 3563 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • tracks editorial consensus
    Across 81 historical paired polls, this pollster's D-margins track the rater consensus (Cook / Sabato / IE / 538 / DDHQ etc.) with high correlation (r ≥ 0.85) and small mean delta (|Δ| ≤ 2pt). Their results align with conventional wisdom.
Pat Toomey 44.0 · Katie McGinty 47.0pollarch
8/7/2016NBC/WSJ/Marist1.20neutral(R+0.7)834±3.4unknown
3563d oldbias R+0.7pt+1
  • 3563d old
    Poll was fielded 3563 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • bias R+0.7pt
    Across 13 historical scored polls the average error vs. actual margin is R+0.7pt.
  • tracks editorial consensus
    Across 16 historical paired polls, this pollster's D-margins track the rater consensus (Cook / Sabato / IE / 538 / DDHQ etc.) with high correlation (r ≥ 0.85) and small mean delta (|Δ| ≤ 2pt). Their results align with conventional wisdom.
Pat Toomey 44.0 · Katie McGinty 48.0pollarch
8/4/2016Susquehanna Polling & Research1.12neutral(D+0.1)772±3.5unknown
3566d old
  • 3566d old
    Poll was fielded 3566 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
Pat Toomey 40.0 · Katie McGinty 42.0pollarch
8/1/2016Franklin & Marshall College0.91L(D+4.4)389±6.3LV
n=3893569d old+2
  • n=389
    Sample size of 389 respondents implies a margin of error around ±5.0pt — wider than typical.
  • 3569d old
    Poll was fielded 3569 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • D+4.7pt vs editors
    Across 15 historical polls where ≥2 editorial raters had rated the race (Cook / Sabato / IE / 538 / DDHQ etc.), this pollster's D-margin averaged 4.7pt MORE D-favorable than the rater consensus. Systematic D-lean relative to conventional wisdom.
  • likely-voter screen
    Likely-voter screen — pollster filters respondents by reported turnout intent. Generally tighter for predicting elections than registered- or adult-population polls.
Pat Toomey 38.0 · Katie McGinty 39.0pollarch
7/31/2016Public Policy Polling1.00(D+1.1)1505±2.7unknown
3570d olduncorrelated with editorial consensus+2
  • 3570d old
    Poll was fielded 3570 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • uncorrelated with editorial consensus
    Across 368 historical paired polls, this pollster's margins don't track the editorial consensus (Pearson r < 0.5). Independence from consensus is informational — could indicate genuine methodological independence or noisy results.
  • bias D+1.1pt
    Across 72 historical scored polls the average error vs. actual margin is D+1.1pt.
  • n=1,505
    Sample size of 1,505 respondents implies a margin of error around ±2.5pt — tighter than the ~600-respondent typical.
Pat Toomey 42.0 · Katie McGinty 41.0pollarch
7/27/2016Suffolk University1.44neutral(D+0.1)500±4.4unknown
3574d oldbias D+0.1pt+1
  • 3574d old
    Poll was fielded 3574 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • bias D+0.1pt
    Across 15 historical scored polls the average error vs. actual margin is D+0.1pt.
  • tracks editorial consensus
    Across 55 historical paired polls, this pollster's D-margins track the rater consensus (Cook / Sabato / IE / 538 / DDHQ etc.) with high correlation (r ≥ 0.85) and small mean delta (|Δ| ≤ 2pt). Their results align with conventional wisdom.
Pat Toomey 36.0 · Katie McGinty 43.0pollarch
7/11/2016Quinnipiac University1.00(D+1.9)982±3.1unknown
3590d oldtracks editorial consensus
  • 3590d old
    Poll was fielded 3590 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • tracks editorial consensus
    Across 81 historical paired polls, this pollster's D-margins track the rater consensus (Cook / Sabato / IE / 538 / DDHQ etc.) with high correlation (r ≥ 0.85) and small mean delta (|Δ| ≤ 2pt). Their results align with conventional wisdom.
Pat Toomey 49.0 · Katie McGinty 39.0pollarch
7/10/2016NBC/WSJ/Marist1.20neutral(R+0.7)829±3.4unknown
3591d oldbias R+0.7pt+1
  • 3591d old
    Poll was fielded 3591 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • bias R+0.7pt
    Across 13 historical scored polls the average error vs. actual margin is R+0.7pt.
  • tracks editorial consensus
    Across 16 historical paired polls, this pollster's D-margins track the rater consensus (Cook / Sabato / IE / 538 / DDHQ etc.) with high correlation (r ≥ 0.85) and small mean delta (|Δ| ≤ 2pt). Their results align with conventional wisdom.
Pat Toomey 44.0 · Katie McGinty 47.0pollarch
6/23/2016Public Policy Polling1.00(D+1.1)980±3.1unknown
3608d olduncorrelated with editorial consensus+1
  • 3608d old
    Poll was fielded 3608 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • uncorrelated with editorial consensus
    Across 368 historical paired polls, this pollster's margins don't track the editorial consensus (Pearson r < 0.5). Independence from consensus is informational — could indicate genuine methodological independence or noisy results.
  • bias D+1.1pt
    Across 72 historical scored polls the average error vs. actual margin is D+1.1pt.
Pat Toomey 40.0 · Katie McGinty 39.0pollarch
6/20/2016Greenberg Quinlan Rosner - Democracy Corps1.00300±5.7unknown
no scored pollsn=300+1
  • no scored polls
    Pollster has no historical polls with a known outcome in our database, so accuracy and bias cannot be measured.
  • n=300
    Sample size of 300 respondents implies a margin of error around ±5.7pt — wider than typical.
  • 3611d old
    Poll was fielded 3611 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
Pat Toomey 46.0 · Katie McGinty 38.0pollarch
6/19/2016Quinnipiac University1.00(D+1.9)950±3.2unknown
3612d oldtracks editorial consensus
  • 3612d old
    Poll was fielded 3612 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • tracks editorial consensus
    Across 81 historical paired polls, this pollster's D-margins track the rater consensus (Cook / Sabato / IE / 538 / DDHQ etc.) with high correlation (r ≥ 0.85) and small mean delta (|Δ| ≤ 2pt). Their results align with conventional wisdom.
Pat Toomey 49.0 · Katie McGinty 40.0pollarch
6/9/2016Public Policy Polling1.00(D+1.1)965±3.2unknown
3622d olduncorrelated with editorial consensus+1
  • 3622d old
    Poll was fielded 3622 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • uncorrelated with editorial consensus
    Across 368 historical paired polls, this pollster's margins don't track the editorial consensus (Pearson r < 0.5). Independence from consensus is informational — could indicate genuine methodological independence or noisy results.
  • bias D+1.1pt
    Across 72 historical scored polls the average error vs. actual margin is D+1.1pt.
Pat Toomey 45.0 · Katie McGinty 42.0pollarch
6/5/2016Public Policy Polling1.00(D+1.1)1106±3.0unknown
3626d olduncorrelated with editorial consensus+1
  • 3626d old
    Poll was fielded 3626 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • uncorrelated with editorial consensus
    Across 368 historical paired polls, this pollster's margins don't track the editorial consensus (Pearson r < 0.5). Independence from consensus is informational — could indicate genuine methodological independence or noisy results.
  • bias D+1.1pt
    Across 72 historical scored polls the average error vs. actual margin is D+1.1pt.
Pat Toomey 41.0 · Katie McGinty 38.0pollarch
5/8/2016Quinnipiac University1.00(D+1.9)1077±3.0unknown
3654d oldtracks editorial consensus
  • 3654d old
    Poll was fielded 3654 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • tracks editorial consensus
    Across 81 historical paired polls, this pollster's D-margins track the rater consensus (Cook / Sabato / IE / 538 / DDHQ etc.) with high correlation (r ≥ 0.85) and small mean delta (|Δ| ≤ 2pt). Their results align with conventional wisdom.
Pat Toomey 45.0 · Katie McGinty 44.0pollarch
4/4/2016Quinnipiac University1.00(D+1.9)1737±2.4unknown
3688d oldn=1,737+1
  • 3688d old
    Poll was fielded 3688 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • n=1,737
    Sample size of 1,737 respondents implies a margin of error around ±2.4pt — tighter than the ~600-respondent typical.
  • tracks editorial consensus
    Across 81 historical paired polls, this pollster's D-margins track the rater consensus (Cook / Sabato / IE / 538 / DDHQ etc.) with high correlation (r ≥ 0.85) and small mean delta (|Δ| ≤ 2pt). Their results align with conventional wisdom.
Pat Toomey 47.0 · Katie McGinty 38.0pollarch
4/4/2016Quinnipiac University1.00(D+1.9)1737±2.4unknown
3688d oldn=1,737+1
  • 3688d old
    Poll was fielded 3688 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • n=1,737
    Sample size of 1,737 respondents implies a margin of error around ±2.4pt — tighter than the ~600-respondent typical.
  • tracks editorial consensus
    Across 81 historical paired polls, this pollster's D-margins track the rater consensus (Cook / Sabato / IE / 538 / DDHQ etc.) with high correlation (r ≥ 0.85) and small mean delta (|Δ| ≤ 2pt). Their results align with conventional wisdom.
Pat Toomey 47.0 · Joe Sestak 39.0pollarch
3/11/2016Mercyhurst University1.00421±4.8unknown
no scored polls3712d old
  • no scored polls
    Pollster has no historical polls with a known outcome in our database, so accuracy and bias cannot be measured.
  • 3712d old
    Poll was fielded 3712 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
Pat Toomey 47.0 · Katie McGinty 34.0pollarch
3/11/2016Mercyhurst University1.00421±4.8unknown
no scored polls3712d old
  • no scored polls
    Pollster has no historical polls with a known outcome in our database, so accuracy and bias cannot be measured.
  • 3712d old
    Poll was fielded 3712 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
Pat Toomey 49.0 · John Fetterman 31.0pollarch
3/11/2016Mercyhurst University1.00421±4.8unknown
no scored polls3712d old
  • no scored polls
    Pollster has no historical polls with a known outcome in our database, so accuracy and bias cannot be measured.
  • 3712d old
    Poll was fielded 3712 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
Pat Toomey 43.0 · Joe Sestak 38.0pollarch
3/11/2016Mercyhurst University1.00421±4.8unknown
no scored polls3712d old
  • no scored polls
    Pollster has no historical polls with a known outcome in our database, so accuracy and bias cannot be measured.
  • 3712d old
    Poll was fielded 3712 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
Pat Toomey 47.0 · Ed Pawlowski 31.0pollarch
3/2/2016Harper Polling1.00662±3.8unknown
no scored polls3721d old
  • no scored polls
    Pollster has no historical polls with a known outcome in our database, so accuracy and bias cannot be measured.
  • 3721d old
    Poll was fielded 3721 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
Pat Toomey 47.0 · Katie McGinty 39.0pollarch
3/2/2016Harper Polling1.00662±3.8unknown
no scored polls3721d old
  • no scored polls
    Pollster has no historical polls with a known outcome in our database, so accuracy and bias cannot be measured.
  • 3721d old
    Poll was fielded 3721 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
Pat Toomey 47.0 · John Fetterman 36.0pollarch
3/2/2016Harper Polling1.00662±3.8unknown
no scored polls3721d old
  • no scored polls
    Pollster has no historical polls with a known outcome in our database, so accuracy and bias cannot be measured.
  • 3721d old
    Poll was fielded 3721 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
Pat Toomey 47.0 · Joe Sestak 41.0pollarch
2/16/2016Robert Morris University1.00511±4.5unknown
no scored polls3736d old
  • no scored polls
    Pollster has no historical polls with a known outcome in our database, so accuracy and bias cannot be measured.
  • 3736d old
    Poll was fielded 3736 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
Pat Toomey 34.0 · Katie McGinty 21.0pollarch
2/16/2016Robert Morris University1.00511±4.5unknown
no scored polls3736d old
  • no scored polls
    Pollster has no historical polls with a known outcome in our database, so accuracy and bias cannot be measured.
  • 3736d old
    Poll was fielded 3736 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
Pat Toomey 38.0 · John Fetterman 14.0pollarch
2/16/2016Robert Morris University1.00511±4.5unknown
no scored polls3736d old
  • no scored polls
    Pollster has no historical polls with a known outcome in our database, so accuracy and bias cannot be measured.
  • 3736d old
    Poll was fielded 3736 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
Pat Toomey 34.0 · Joe Sestak 18.0pollarch
10/11/2015Public Policy Polling1.00(D+1.1)1012±3.1unknown
3864d olduncorrelated with editorial consensus+1
  • 3864d old
    Poll was fielded 3864 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • uncorrelated with editorial consensus
    Across 368 historical paired polls, this pollster's margins don't track the editorial consensus (Pearson r < 0.5). Independence from consensus is informational — could indicate genuine methodological independence or noisy results.
  • bias D+1.1pt
    Across 72 historical scored polls the average error vs. actual margin is D+1.1pt.
Pat Toomey 43.0 · Katie McGinty 36.0pollarch
10/11/2015Public Policy Polling1.00(D+1.1)1012unknown
3864d olduncorrelated with editorial consensus+1
  • 3864d old
    Poll was fielded 3864 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • uncorrelated with editorial consensus
    Across 368 historical paired polls, this pollster's margins don't track the editorial consensus (Pearson r < 0.5). Independence from consensus is informational — could indicate genuine methodological independence or noisy results.
  • bias D+1.1pt
    Across 72 historical scored polls the average error vs. actual margin is D+1.1pt.
Pat Toomey 41.0 · John Fetterman 34.0pollarch
10/11/2015Public Policy Polling1.00(D+1.1)1012unknown
3864d olduncorrelated with editorial consensus+1
  • 3864d old
    Poll was fielded 3864 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • uncorrelated with editorial consensus
    Across 368 historical paired polls, this pollster's margins don't track the editorial consensus (Pearson r < 0.5). Independence from consensus is informational — could indicate genuine methodological independence or noisy results.
  • bias D+1.1pt
    Across 72 historical scored polls the average error vs. actual margin is D+1.1pt.
Pat Toomey 41.0 · Joe Sestak 38.0pollarch
10/5/2015Quinnipiac University1.00(D+1.9)1049±3.0unknown
3870d oldtracks editorial consensus
  • 3870d old
    Poll was fielded 3870 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • tracks editorial consensus
    Across 81 historical paired polls, this pollster's D-margins track the rater consensus (Cook / Sabato / IE / 538 / DDHQ etc.) with high correlation (r ≥ 0.85) and small mean delta (|Δ| ≤ 2pt). Their results align with conventional wisdom.
Pat Toomey 51.0 · Katie McGinty 31.0pollarch
10/5/2015Quinnipiac University1.00(D+1.9)1049±3.0unknown
3870d oldtracks editorial consensus
  • 3870d old
    Poll was fielded 3870 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • tracks editorial consensus
    Across 81 historical paired polls, this pollster's D-margins track the rater consensus (Cook / Sabato / IE / 538 / DDHQ etc.) with high correlation (r ≥ 0.85) and small mean delta (|Δ| ≤ 2pt). Their results align with conventional wisdom.
Pat Toomey 49.0 · Joe Sestak 34.0pollarch
9/10/2015Harper Polling1.00700±3.7unknown
no scored polls3895d old
  • no scored polls
    Pollster has no historical polls with a known outcome in our database, so accuracy and bias cannot be measured.
  • 3895d old
    Poll was fielded 3895 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
Pat Toomey 48.0 · Katie McGinty 34.0pollarch
9/10/2015Harper Polling1.00700±3.7unknown
no scored polls3895d old
  • no scored polls
    Pollster has no historical polls with a known outcome in our database, so accuracy and bias cannot be measured.
  • 3895d old
    Poll was fielded 3895 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
Pat Toomey 47.0 · Joe Sestak 37.0pollarch
8/24/2015Franklin & Marshall College0.91L(D+4.4)605±3.9unknown
3912d oldD+4.7pt vs editors
  • 3912d old
    Poll was fielded 3912 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • D+4.7pt vs editors
    Across 15 historical polls where ≥2 editorial raters had rated the race (Cook / Sabato / IE / 538 / DDHQ etc.), this pollster's D-margin averaged 4.7pt MORE D-favorable than the rater consensus. Systematic D-lean relative to conventional wisdom.
Pat Toomey 35.0 · Katie McGinty 28.0pollarch
8/24/2015Franklin & Marshall College0.91L(D+4.4)605±3.9unknown
3912d oldD+4.7pt vs editors
  • 3912d old
    Poll was fielded 3912 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • D+4.7pt vs editors
    Across 15 historical polls where ≥2 editorial raters had rated the race (Cook / Sabato / IE / 538 / DDHQ etc.), this pollster's D-margin averaged 4.7pt MORE D-favorable than the rater consensus. Systematic D-lean relative to conventional wisdom.
Pat Toomey 41.0 · Joe Sestak 29.0pollarch
8/18/2015Quinnipiac University1.00(D+1.9)1085±3.0unknown
3918d oldtracks editorial consensus
  • 3918d old
    Poll was fielded 3918 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • tracks editorial consensus
    Across 81 historical paired polls, this pollster's D-margins track the rater consensus (Cook / Sabato / IE / 538 / DDHQ etc.) with high correlation (r ≥ 0.85) and small mean delta (|Δ| ≤ 2pt). Their results align with conventional wisdom.
Pat Toomey 48.0 · Katie McGinty 32.0pollarch
8/18/2015Quinnipiac University1.00(D+1.9)1085±3.0unknown
3918d oldtracks editorial consensus
  • 3918d old
    Poll was fielded 3918 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • tracks editorial consensus
    Across 81 historical paired polls, this pollster's D-margins track the rater consensus (Cook / Sabato / IE / 538 / DDHQ etc.) with high correlation (r ≥ 0.85) and small mean delta (|Δ| ≤ 2pt). Their results align with conventional wisdom.
Pat Toomey 48.0 · Joe Sestak 33.0pollarch
6/15/2015Quinnipiac University1.00(D+1.9)970±3.2unknown
3982d oldtracks editorial consensus
  • 3982d old
    Poll was fielded 3982 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • tracks editorial consensus
    Across 81 historical paired polls, this pollster's D-margins track the rater consensus (Cook / Sabato / IE / 538 / DDHQ etc.) with high correlation (r ≥ 0.85) and small mean delta (|Δ| ≤ 2pt). Their results align with conventional wisdom.
Pat Toomey 47.0 · Joe Sestak 36.0pollarch
6/15/2015Quinnipiac University1.00(D+1.9)970±3.2unknown
3982d oldtracks editorial consensus
  • 3982d old
    Poll was fielded 3982 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • tracks editorial consensus
    Across 81 historical paired polls, this pollster's D-margins track the rater consensus (Cook / Sabato / IE / 538 / DDHQ etc.) with high correlation (r ≥ 0.85) and small mean delta (|Δ| ≤ 2pt). Their results align with conventional wisdom.
Pat Toomey 52.0 · Ed Pawlowski 28.0pollarch
6/14/2015Franklin & Marshall College0.91L(D+4.4)556±4.1unknown
3983d oldD+4.7pt vs editors
  • 3983d old
    Poll was fielded 3983 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • D+4.7pt vs editors
    Across 15 historical polls where ≥2 editorial raters had rated the race (Cook / Sabato / IE / 538 / DDHQ etc.), this pollster's D-margin averaged 4.7pt MORE D-favorable than the rater consensus. Systematic D-lean relative to conventional wisdom.
Pat Toomey 35.0 · Joe Sestak 31.0pollarch
6/14/2015Franklin & Marshall College0.91L(D+4.4)556±4.1unknown
3983d oldD+4.7pt vs editors
  • 3983d old
    Poll was fielded 3983 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • D+4.7pt vs editors
    Across 15 historical polls where ≥2 editorial raters had rated the race (Cook / Sabato / IE / 538 / DDHQ etc.), this pollster's D-margin averaged 4.7pt MORE D-favorable than the rater consensus. Systematic D-lean relative to conventional wisdom.
Pat Toomey 34.0 · Ed Pawlowski 23.0pollarch
5/24/2015Public Policy Polling1.00(D+1.1)799±3.5unknown
4004d olduncorrelated with editorial consensus+1
  • 4004d old
    Poll was fielded 4004 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • uncorrelated with editorial consensus
    Across 368 historical paired polls, this pollster's margins don't track the editorial consensus (Pearson r < 0.5). Independence from consensus is informational — could indicate genuine methodological independence or noisy results.
  • bias D+1.1pt
    Across 72 historical scored polls the average error vs. actual margin is D+1.1pt.
Pat Toomey 42.0 · Joe Sestak 38.0pollarch
5/24/2015Public Policy Polling1.00(D+1.1)799±3.5unknown
4004d olduncorrelated with editorial consensus+1
  • 4004d old
    Poll was fielded 4004 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • uncorrelated with editorial consensus
    Across 368 historical paired polls, this pollster's margins don't track the editorial consensus (Pearson r < 0.5). Independence from consensus is informational — could indicate genuine methodological independence or noisy results.
  • bias D+1.1pt
    Across 72 historical scored polls the average error vs. actual margin is D+1.1pt.
Pat Toomey 44.0 · Chris Carney 35.0pollarch
5/24/2015Public Policy Polling1.00(D+1.1)799±3.5unknown
4004d olduncorrelated with editorial consensus+1
  • 4004d old
    Poll was fielded 4004 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • uncorrelated with editorial consensus
    Across 368 historical paired polls, this pollster's margins don't track the editorial consensus (Pearson r < 0.5). Independence from consensus is informational — could indicate genuine methodological independence or noisy results.
  • bias D+1.1pt
    Across 72 historical scored polls the average error vs. actual margin is D+1.1pt.
Pat Toomey 44.0 · Vincent Hughes 35.0pollarch
5/24/2015Public Policy Polling1.00(D+1.1)799±3.5unknown
4004d olduncorrelated with editorial consensus+1
  • 4004d old
    Poll was fielded 4004 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • uncorrelated with editorial consensus
    Across 368 historical paired polls, this pollster's margins don't track the editorial consensus (Pearson r < 0.5). Independence from consensus is informational — could indicate genuine methodological independence or noisy results.
  • bias D+1.1pt
    Across 72 historical scored polls the average error vs. actual margin is D+1.1pt.
Pat Toomey 44.0 · Ed Pawlowski 34.0pollarch
5/24/2015Public Policy Polling1.00(D+1.1)799±3.5unknown
4004d olduncorrelated with editorial consensus+1
  • 4004d old
    Poll was fielded 4004 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • uncorrelated with editorial consensus
    Across 368 historical paired polls, this pollster's margins don't track the editorial consensus (Pearson r < 0.5). Independence from consensus is informational — could indicate genuine methodological independence or noisy results.
  • bias D+1.1pt
    Across 72 historical scored polls the average error vs. actual margin is D+1.1pt.
Pat Toomey 46.0 · Ed Rendell 41.0pollarch
5/24/2015Public Policy Polling1.00(D+1.1)799±3.5unknown
4004d olduncorrelated with editorial consensus+1
  • 4004d old
    Poll was fielded 4004 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • uncorrelated with editorial consensus
    Across 368 historical paired polls, this pollster's margins don't track the editorial consensus (Pearson r < 0.5). Independence from consensus is informational — could indicate genuine methodological independence or noisy results.
  • bias D+1.1pt
    Across 72 historical scored polls the average error vs. actual margin is D+1.1pt.
Pat Toomey 44.0 · Seth Williams 33.0pollarch
5/16/2015Robert Morris University1.00529±4.5unknown
no scored polls4012d old
  • no scored polls
    Pollster has no historical polls with a known outcome in our database, so accuracy and bias cannot be measured.
  • 4012d old
    Poll was fielded 4012 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
Pat Toomey 28.5 · Joe Sestak 34.2pollarch
5/7/2015Harper Polling1.00503±4.4unknown
no scored polls4021d old
  • no scored polls
    Pollster has no historical polls with a known outcome in our database, so accuracy and bias cannot be measured.
  • 4021d old
    Poll was fielded 4021 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
Pat Toomey 53.0 · Joe Sestak 32.0pollarch
5/7/2015Harper Polling1.00503±4.4unknown
no scored polls4021d old
  • no scored polls
    Pollster has no historical polls with a known outcome in our database, so accuracy and bias cannot be measured.
  • 4021d old
    Poll was fielded 4021 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
Pat Toomey 54.0 · Ed Pawlowski 30.0pollarch
5/7/2015Harper Polling1.00503±4.4unknown
no scored polls4021d old
  • no scored polls
    Pollster has no historical polls with a known outcome in our database, so accuracy and bias cannot be measured.
  • 4021d old
    Poll was fielded 4021 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
Pat Toomey 55.0 · Josh Shapiro 27.0pollarch
3/28/2015Quinnipiac University1.00(D+1.9)1036±3.0unknown
4061d oldtracks editorial consensus
  • 4061d old
    Poll was fielded 4061 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • tracks editorial consensus
    Across 81 historical paired polls, this pollster's D-margins track the rater consensus (Cook / Sabato / IE / 538 / DDHQ etc.) with high correlation (r ≥ 0.85) and small mean delta (|Δ| ≤ 2pt). Their results align with conventional wisdom.
Pat Toomey 48.0 · Joe Sestak 35.0pollarch
3/23/2015Franklin & Marshall College0.91L(D+4.4)597±4.2unknown
4066d oldD+4.7pt vs editors
  • 4066d old
    Poll was fielded 4066 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • D+4.7pt vs editors
    Across 15 historical polls where ≥2 editorial raters had rated the race (Cook / Sabato / IE / 538 / DDHQ etc.), this pollster's D-margin averaged 4.7pt MORE D-favorable than the rater consensus. Systematic D-lean relative to conventional wisdom.
Pat Toomey 34.0 · Joe Sestak 29.0pollarch
1/18/2015Public Policy Polling1.00(D+1.1)1042±3.0unknown
4130d olduncorrelated with editorial consensus+1
  • 4130d old
    Poll was fielded 4130 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • uncorrelated with editorial consensus
    Across 368 historical paired polls, this pollster's margins don't track the editorial consensus (Pearson r < 0.5). Independence from consensus is informational — could indicate genuine methodological independence or noisy results.
  • bias D+1.1pt
    Across 72 historical scored polls the average error vs. actual margin is D+1.1pt.
Pat Toomey 40.0 · Joe Sestak 36.0pollarch
1/18/2015Public Policy Polling1.00(D+1.1)1042±3.0unknown
4130d olduncorrelated with editorial consensus+1
  • 4130d old
    Poll was fielded 4130 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • uncorrelated with editorial consensus
    Across 368 historical paired polls, this pollster's margins don't track the editorial consensus (Pearson r < 0.5). Independence from consensus is informational — could indicate genuine methodological independence or noisy results.
  • bias D+1.1pt
    Across 72 historical scored polls the average error vs. actual margin is D+1.1pt.
Pat Toomey 44.0 · Kathleen Kane 38.0pollarch
1/18/2015Public Policy Polling1.00(D+1.1)1042±3.0unknown
4130d olduncorrelated with editorial consensus+1
  • 4130d old
    Poll was fielded 4130 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • uncorrelated with editorial consensus
    Across 368 historical paired polls, this pollster's margins don't track the editorial consensus (Pearson r < 0.5). Independence from consensus is informational — could indicate genuine methodological independence or noisy results.
  • bias D+1.1pt
    Across 72 historical scored polls the average error vs. actual margin is D+1.1pt.
Pat Toomey 42.0 · Chris Matthews 38.0pollarch
1/18/2015Public Policy Polling1.00(D+1.1)1042±3.0unknown
4130d olduncorrelated with editorial consensus+1
  • 4130d old
    Poll was fielded 4130 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • uncorrelated with editorial consensus
    Across 368 historical paired polls, this pollster's margins don't track the editorial consensus (Pearson r < 0.5). Independence from consensus is informational — could indicate genuine methodological independence or noisy results.
  • bias D+1.1pt
    Across 72 historical scored polls the average error vs. actual margin is D+1.1pt.
Pat Toomey 42.0 · Michael Nutter 35.0pollarch
1/18/2015Public Policy Polling1.00(D+1.1)1042±3.0unknown
4130d olduncorrelated with editorial consensus+1
  • 4130d old
    Poll was fielded 4130 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • uncorrelated with editorial consensus
    Across 368 historical paired polls, this pollster's margins don't track the editorial consensus (Pearson r < 0.5). Independence from consensus is informational — could indicate genuine methodological independence or noisy results.
  • bias D+1.1pt
    Across 72 historical scored polls the average error vs. actual margin is D+1.1pt.
Pat Toomey 41.0 · Ed Rendell 44.0pollarch
1/18/2015Public Policy Polling1.00(D+1.1)1042±3.0unknown
4130d olduncorrelated with editorial consensus+1
  • 4130d old
    Poll was fielded 4130 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • uncorrelated with editorial consensus
    Across 368 historical paired polls, this pollster's margins don't track the editorial consensus (Pearson r < 0.5). Independence from consensus is informational — could indicate genuine methodological independence or noisy results.
  • bias D+1.1pt
    Across 72 historical scored polls the average error vs. actual margin is D+1.1pt.
Pat Toomey 43.0 · Josh Shapiro 31.0pollarch
6/1/2014Public Policy Polling1.00(D+1.1)835±3.4unknown
4361d olduncorrelated with editorial consensus+1
  • 4361d old
    Poll was fielded 4361 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • uncorrelated with editorial consensus
    Across 368 historical paired polls, this pollster's margins don't track the editorial consensus (Pearson r < 0.5). Independence from consensus is informational — could indicate genuine methodological independence or noisy results.
  • bias D+1.1pt
    Across 72 historical scored polls the average error vs. actual margin is D+1.1pt.
Pat Toomey 42.0 · Katie McGinty 38.0pollarch
6/1/2014Public Policy Polling1.00(D+1.1)835±3.4unknown
4361d olduncorrelated with editorial consensus+1
  • 4361d old
    Poll was fielded 4361 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • uncorrelated with editorial consensus
    Across 368 historical paired polls, this pollster's margins don't track the editorial consensus (Pearson r < 0.5). Independence from consensus is informational — could indicate genuine methodological independence or noisy results.
  • bias D+1.1pt
    Across 72 historical scored polls the average error vs. actual margin is D+1.1pt.
Pat Toomey 41.0 · Joe Sestak 35.0pollarch
6/1/2014Public Policy Polling1.00(D+1.1)835±3.4unknown
4361d olduncorrelated with editorial consensus+1
  • 4361d old
    Poll was fielded 4361 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • uncorrelated with editorial consensus
    Across 368 historical paired polls, this pollster's margins don't track the editorial consensus (Pearson r < 0.5). Independence from consensus is informational — could indicate genuine methodological independence or noisy results.
  • bias D+1.1pt
    Across 72 historical scored polls the average error vs. actual margin is D+1.1pt.
Pat Toomey 40.0 · Kathleen Kane 42.0pollarch
6/1/2014Public Policy Polling1.00(D+1.1)835±3.4unknown
4361d olduncorrelated with editorial consensus+1
  • 4361d old
    Poll was fielded 4361 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • uncorrelated with editorial consensus
    Across 368 historical paired polls, this pollster's margins don't track the editorial consensus (Pearson r < 0.5). Independence from consensus is informational — could indicate genuine methodological independence or noisy results.
  • bias D+1.1pt
    Across 72 historical scored polls the average error vs. actual margin is D+1.1pt.
Pat Toomey 41.0 · Josh Shapiro 32.0pollarch
12/22/2013Harper Polling1.00604±4.0unknown
no scored polls4522d old
  • no scored polls
    Pollster has no historical polls with a known outcome in our database, so accuracy and bias cannot be measured.
  • 4522d old
    Poll was fielded 4522 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
Pat Toomey 49.0 · Joe Sestak 42.0pollarch
12/22/2013Harper Polling1.00604±4.0unknown
no scored polls4522d old
  • no scored polls
    Pollster has no historical polls with a known outcome in our database, so accuracy and bias cannot be measured.
  • 4522d old
    Poll was fielded 4522 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
Pat Toomey 49.0 · Kathleen Kane 44.0pollarch
11/25/2013Public Policy Polling1.00(D+1.1)693±3.7unknown
4549d olduncorrelated with editorial consensus+1
  • 4549d old
    Poll was fielded 4549 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • uncorrelated with editorial consensus
    Across 368 historical paired polls, this pollster's margins don't track the editorial consensus (Pearson r < 0.5). Independence from consensus is informational — could indicate genuine methodological independence or noisy results.
  • bias D+1.1pt
    Across 72 historical scored polls the average error vs. actual margin is D+1.1pt.
Pat Toomey 42.0 · Joe Sestak 42.0pollarch
11/25/2013Public Policy Polling1.00(D+1.1)693±3.7unknown
4549d olduncorrelated with editorial consensus+1
  • 4549d old
    Poll was fielded 4549 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • uncorrelated with editorial consensus
    Across 368 historical paired polls, this pollster's margins don't track the editorial consensus (Pearson r < 0.5). Independence from consensus is informational — could indicate genuine methodological independence or noisy results.
  • bias D+1.1pt
    Across 72 historical scored polls the average error vs. actual margin is D+1.1pt.
Pat Toomey 42.0 · Kathleen Kane 46.0pollarch
6/4/2013Quinnipiac University1.00(D+1.9)1032±3.1unknown
4723d oldtracks editorial consensus
  • 4723d old
    Poll was fielded 4723 days ago. Older polls reflect an earlier state of the race and are weighted down in the rolling average.
  • tracks editorial consensus
    Across 81 historical paired polls, this pollster's D-margins track the rater consensus (Cook / Sabato / IE / 538 / DDHQ etc.) with high correlation (r ≥ 0.85) and small mean delta (|Δ| ≤ 2pt). Their results align with conventional wisdom.
Pat Toomey 42.0 · Joe Sestak 37.0pollarch

Trust signals are deterministic flags computed from the pollster scorecard (track-record size, historical bias, aggregation weight) and the poll itself (sample size, population, age, citation availability). No interpretation; click any row to see the cited numbers behind each flag.

Endorsements

Source · Wikipedia · 19 total
Pat Toomey (R)
19 endorsements · source
Elected officials (7)
  • Carly Fiorina — former CEO of Hewlett-Packard , Republican nominee for the U.S. Senate in California in 2010 , candidate for president in 2016 [ 14 ]
  • Gabby Giffords — U.S. representative from Arizona's 8th congressional district (2007–2012) (Democratic) [ 12 ]
  • John Cornyn — U.S. senator from Texas (2002–present), Senate Majority Whip (2015–2019) [ 9 ]
  • John McCain — U.S. senator from Arizona (1987–2018), Republican nominee for president in 2008 , candidate for president in 2000 [ 11 ]
  • Joni Ernst — U.S. senator from Iowa (2015–present) [ 10 ]
  • Michael Bloomberg — 108th mayor of New York City (2002–2013) and CEO of Bloomberg L.P. [ 13 ]
  • Ted Cruz — U.S. senator from Texas (2013–present), candidate for president in 2016 [ 9 ]
Newspapers (6)
  • Bucks County Courier Times — [ 19 ]
  • Pittsburgh Post-Gazette — [ 22 ]
  • The Patriot-News — [ 21 ]
  • The Tribune-Democrat — [ 23 ]
  • Williamsport Sun-Gazette — [ 24 ]
  • York Daily Record — [ 25 ]
Other (6)
  • Altoona Mirror — [ 18 ]
  • Americans for Responsible Solutions — [ 15 ]
  • Club for Growth — [ 16 ]
  • John Bolton — 25th United States Ambassador to the United Nations (2005–2006) [ 8 ]
  • The Intelligencer — [ 20 ]
  • United States Chamber of Commerce — [ 17 ]

Editorial ratings · poll-vs-rater

3 raters
Rater Rating Updated Poll D-marg. Rater marg. Δ poll−rater
The Cook Political Report Tossup Nov 2 0.0
Real Clear Politics Tossup Nov 7 0.0
Sabato's Crystal Ball Lean D Nov 7 +3.5

Δ POLL−RATER = polling-consensus margin minus the rater's implied bucket midpoint. Positive = polls more D than rater; negative = rater more D than polls. |Δ| < 0.6 well-aligned · 0.6–1.5 mild divergence · ≥1.5 contested call.

last poll 116 months ago (11/7/2016) last market quote rating computed 1 day ago
Rating history (1 change)
  • 5/6/2026 Tilt R via pvi